1. Mar 3, 2006

   

   prarieoyster New Member

   New Britain, CT

   Joined:

   Nov 9, 2005

   Messages:

   17

   Because whever is sold the vehicle claimed it was a '57. He must have had some title or registration info to support his claim.

    

   prarieoyster, Mar 3, 2006

   #21
2. Mar 3, 2006

   

   sparky Sandgroper Staff Member Founder

   Perth, WA

   Joined:

   Sep 20, 2002

   Messages:

   9,221

   Definitely a '64 or later serial number, Timgr's comments and the cowl lacking a battery box indicate otherwise to me unless the frame VIN indicates otherwise we know what the body of it is.

    

   sparky, Mar 3, 2006

   #22

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in