1. Registration trouble? Please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom right corner of the page and your issue will be resolved.
    Dismiss Notice

Some ??? about Bump steer article...

Discussion in 'Early CJ5 and CJ6 Tech' started by Old Bill, Jan 1, 2006.

  1. Jan 1, 2006
    Old Bill

    Old Bill Aggressively passive....

    Really Southern...
    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Messages:
    822
    What I'm referring to is HERE.


    I see in the pictures that the '70 has the drag link (?) connected nearly at the passenger side knuckle, where as on mine, it's connected nearly at the middle. My question is are the bell crank and knucles the same as to allow me to do this conversion? Will the parts listed work for my '57?

    I've got a spare set of knucles that I'm gonna convert to studs, and thought that this would be a good conversion while I'm at it.
     
  2. Jan 1, 2006
    Mcruff

    Mcruff Earlycj5 Machinist

    Albertville, AL
    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2002
    Messages:
    5,349
    Thad the difference from this article to your setup is yours is stock and he already did the 1 piece drag link conversion. He did his conversion and then later converted to the Heim joints where as you would be doing it all at once.
    Oh and yes your stock parts are fine for this conversion.
     
  3. Jan 1, 2006
    w3srl

    w3srl All-around swell dude Staff Member

    Port Orange, FL
    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2002
    Messages:
    4,275
    The article shows an upgrade to the crossover-type steering setup, with new, beefier tie-rod ends. The author was obviosly trying to tighten up has stock steering and I'm sure it helped a LOT in that regard. I'm not sure that his soulution would do much in the way of reducing bump steer though, since the drag link from the bellcrank to the right-side knuckle is still at a pretty good angle. Another thing that I don't particularly care for on this setup is that the stock ross-box is still there, as is the old fore/aft drag link and this leaves more joints to wear & keep lubed/adjusted. In some states the spherical rod ends are also not legal for street use, and there is no boot to keep out dirt and crud like an OEM joint.

    In order to reduce/eliminate the bump steer problem, you have to get that drag link as close to parallel to the tie rod as possible. The Saginaw steering conversion does this by virtue of the box being mounted to the frame and the pitman arm is just slightly higher than the tie rod.

    In this picture you can see how the tie rod and the new drag link line up nicely with the Saginaw swap:[​IMG]

    I know lots of folks here have done the crossover setup while retaining the ross box, but IMHO if you are going to go to those lengths to tighten up your steering you might as well go whole-hog to the manual saginaw setup while you are at it. Yes, it IS a lot of work, but you'll end up with a much, much tighter steering setup that steers almost effortlessly even with a manual box.

    You'll think you died and went to heaven!
     
  4. Jan 1, 2006
    Old Bill

    Old Bill Aggressively passive....

    Really Southern...
    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Messages:
    822
    Mike....Thanks for the concise answer. I'll be looking into this further.

    Steve....I can appreciate that the Ross is lacking for some, but I'm looking to keep my Jeep as nearly stock as possible. That's to say, I really don't want to do any mods that can't easily be reversed. I don't doubt the saggi conversion is absolutely superior, but I have to believe that doing the heim joint conversion will help a lot as well. (just not as much as a saggi) FWIW, I'm not having troubles with bump steer, I just wanted to tighten/beef up a little.

    Any other ideas/opinions?
     
  5. Jan 1, 2006
    Mcruff

    Mcruff Earlycj5 Machinist

    Albertville, AL
    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2002
    Messages:
    5,349
    Here is a photo of mine. Steve used the original dana 25/27 mine has a dana 30 swapped in with saginaw. Notice how flat the steering arm is compared to most. Mine has noi detectable bump steer.
    [​IMG]

    Thad you could use the double hole knuckle on the passenger side. This will allow you to run a similar setup without Heim joints. I personally don't care for Heim joints on a steering application like this, but that is my own thing.
     
  6. Jan 1, 2006
    w3srl

    w3srl All-around swell dude Staff Member

    Port Orange, FL
    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2002
    Messages:
    4,275
    Didn't Mike Boyink run the one-piece tie rod setup on Dutch?
     
  7. Jan 1, 2006
    Boyink

    Boyink Super Moderator Staff Member

    Tulsa, OK
    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2002
    Messages:
    6,197
    Yes, with the Ross box.
     
  8. Jan 1, 2006
    Old Bill

    Old Bill Aggressively passive....

    Really Southern...
    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Messages:
    822
    So spill it Mike, was it worthwhile? What improvements did you notice?
     
  9. Jan 1, 2006
    Old Bill

    Old Bill Aggressively passive....

    Really Southern...
    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Messages:
    822
    Fill me in on this please. What made you shy away from the heim joints?
    What is a double hole knuckle?
     
  10. Jan 1, 2006
    Boyink

    Boyink Super Moderator Staff Member

    Tulsa, OK
    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2002
    Messages:
    6,197
    I did it as part of a complete steering re-do with rebuilt knuckles/knuckle studs, etc so it's hard to know what to attribute to just the tie rod conversion.

    I never really had much bump steer with only 1" spring lift and 32" tires, but overall the steering was tight and easy to control. I could drink :coffee: driving down the road with no issues...;)

    Overall it just appealed to me from a simplicity perspective - oh and easier to set toe in as well.
     
  11. Jan 1, 2006
    Patrick

    Patrick Super Moderator Staff Member

    Los Alamos, NM
    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2002
    Messages:
    8,360
    I am running the one piece tie rod with Ross..... Seems to track better on the road.
     
  12. Jan 1, 2006
    Mcruff

    Mcruff Earlycj5 Machinist

    Albertville, AL
    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2002
    Messages:
    5,349
    The main reason I dislike Heim joints is the fact they are open so dirt and debris along with water are totally free to get in them.

    The double hole knuckle is just what I said it is literally.
    The stock cj setup was the only Jeep that used the particular steering we have. The other jeep models used a knuckle on the passenger side that was longer and had 2 holes cast in it. One was for the long tie rod to connect from side to side and the other hole was for the short tie rod to connect to either the steering box or bellcrank. All axles after the dana 30 was introduced have the 2 hole knuckle. This allows the toe in to stay the same all the time where as the stock set up changed the toe in every time you hit a bump or the suspension flexs.
    If you want a picture of the 2 hole knuckle send me an email addy. The dana 44's of this era used a closed 2 hole knuckle and are compatible with the dana 25/27 axles. The friend (firefighter mike) got one from Nickmil for his dana 27.
     
  13. Jan 1, 2006
    timgr

    timgr We stand on the shoulders of giants. 2022 Sponsor

    Medford Mass USA
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Messages:
    23,596
    The Wagoneer used a Dana 27 or closed-end 30 with a passenger side 2-hole knuckle until '74 when Jeep went to the open knuckle 44. I've been told that all the 2-hole closed-end knuckles are the same - Wagoneer and J-truck, 27, 30 and 44. The Jeepster Commando used a 2-hole tie rod end as seen in Steve's (w3srl) pics above. Either will work AFAIK.

    Should be easy to find a 2-hole knuckle - the long-tube 27 and 30 are often upgraded for open knuckle Jeep 44s or Dodge 44/60s.
     
  14. Jan 4, 2006
    Jim Wiseman

    Jim Wiseman New Member

    Palo Alto, CA
    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2002
    Messages:
    36
    Sorry, I've been trailing in Panamint Valley... That article was about my efforts to tighten up my steering. It was a mess, sloppy ball joints and that "angle of the dangle" drag link, driving a freeway and hitting a bump was exciting. I tried to locate the major sources of the problem and fix them. There were two problems, slop and bump steer. With someone turing the steering wheel back and forth a few degrees, crawl around the frontside and locate where the steering movement is spent. I found a large rotation of my tie rod due to the three ball joint design; that had to go. Second was the angle of the drag link; that could stand a little improvement. I didn't find the Ross box to have a significant amount of slop. The bell crank and its connections had a little but that would have to wait until I could do things right and go Saganaw. I tried to keep what I did compatable with a future Saganaw upgrade. That was years ago, I haven't felt the need to do any more to the steering. There is no problem with dirt getting in the joints, they are far too tight and too smooth for anything to get inside. They do not rust.
     
New Posts