1. Registration trouble? Please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom right corner of the page and your issue will be resolved.
    Dismiss Notice

Tie-rod Flip Question

Discussion in 'Builds and Fabricators Forum' started by FinoCJ, Jul 17, 2023.

  1. Jul 17, 2023
    FinoCJ

    FinoCJ 1970 CJ5 Staff Member

    Bozeman, MT
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2013
    Messages:
    5,652
    Been looking into a tie rod flip....The flip at the knuckles is straight forward, and will raise the knuckle end of the drag link equally so. This will flatten out and reduce the drag link angle.....buuuuttttt....there is a thing as raising it too much. Depending on where the steering box is mounted (specificially its height) and the pitman arm, the pitman arm end of the drag link could end up lower than than the knuckle end (a sort of reversed drag link angle).....is it possible to use the same TRE flip sleeves to flip the drag link to the top of the pitman arm mount? Obviously, this scenario is using a flat (no drop pitman arm)......but is there such a thing a 'raised' pitman arm as opposed to a drop pitman arm if needed - that would allow for standard drag link mounting from the bottom into the pitman arm.

    Here are a few pics for reference....thanks to Doug's pics, here is sorta of what I am getting at....Doug has a relatively low mounted saggy box with flat pitman arm, and the drag link is nice and horizontal (minimal drag link angle)....you can imagine if the tie-rod and drag link are flipped at the knuckle in this situation, but the drag link to pitman arm connection is left as is, the drag link would sort of have a 'reverse' angle....
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  2. Jul 17, 2023
    Norcal69

    Norcal69 Out of the box thinker 2024 Sponsor 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    Northern California
    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    3,569
    The Pictures aren't working.

    Yes, you could actually get your tie rod too high, but it is an easy to correct issue.
    There are a ton of different drop pitman arms out out there. Your jeep with BDS lift is unlikely to end up with reverse bump steer unless you had a big drop arm, like something for a lifted application where additional drop was built into the arm.
    Unless your steering box is mounted super low, I am willing to bet that you end up needing a stock YJ drop pitman arm with your setup.
     
  3. Jul 17, 2023
    FinoCJ

    FinoCJ 1970 CJ5 Staff Member

    Bozeman, MT
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2013
    Messages:
    5,652
    Try the pics again.....
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    This jeep has I think the BDS spings - or at least something very similar. Flat pitman arm, no TRE flip. If you flipped the TRE and drag link at the knuckle, I think it'd be very close to having a reverse drag link angle.....its not like it would be undriveable - heck, most jeeps have some 'normal' drag link angle, even if its not ideal, and the driving effect of 'normal' vs 'reverse' drag link angle is the same. But having reverse angle sort of offsets the advantages of raising the them in the first place with the flip kit (for me at least, its about added clearance and getting them above the center of the axle carrier to create a bit more clearance with the front diff cover and the leaf spring clip.

    This is truly the cause of the issue, but may be what it is......I don't 'need' to flip the TREs, just thought it might be nice.....just don't want to ream out the knuckle holes as there is no going back after that.
     
  4. Jul 17, 2023
    Norcal69

    Norcal69 Out of the box thinker 2024 Sponsor 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    Northern California
    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    3,569
    A tie rod flip would make Doug's steering geometry just about perfect.
    Keep in mind that with a Y link setup the drag link is going to the center of the tie rod, so it does not go up as high as it would on a 2 hole rt hand knuckle situation.
    Doug is using a kinda funky steering box mount that puts the box down low. That's not really a problem if you aren't going to do the extreme trails. If you purchase the advance adapters mount that places the steering box up higher on the frame rail.
    https://www.advanceadapters.com/5416
    Using this bracket will require you to run the steering shaft through the front cross member.

    A tie rod flip is 100% reversible.
    You just grind off the welds and insert the tie rod flip bushing to the bottom side. Its really no different than using them from the top.
     
  5. Jul 17, 2023
    colojeepguy

    colojeepguy Colorado Springs

    At the foot of...
    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    7,178
    Yep, BDS 2.5"
     
  6. Jul 17, 2023
    colojeepguy

    colojeepguy Colorado Springs

    At the foot of...
    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    7,178
    Thats a stock mount for an intermediate CJ.
    The box is lower than a lot of conversions but it enabled me to convert to PS without modification to the motor mounts, exhaust or front crossmember.
     
  7. Jul 17, 2023
    Norcal69

    Norcal69 Out of the box thinker 2024 Sponsor 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    Northern California
    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    3,569
    That makes sense.
    I'm not knocking your mounting, just that it is much lower than the traditional location for retrofitted systems.
    On a trail as rough as the Rubicon, you would be hitting your steering box on some rocks.
     
  8. Jul 17, 2023
    FinoCJ

    FinoCJ 1970 CJ5 Staff Member

    Bozeman, MT
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2013
    Messages:
    5,652
    that is the cast iron single piece mount I think....same as a commando....It mounts to the inside of an open channel frame rail? In other words, it wasn't originally used with a boxed frame rail?

    I think in 76+ they went to the 2piece stamped metal bracket that worked with boxed frame rails?
     
  9. Jul 17, 2023
    FinoCJ

    FinoCJ 1970 CJ5 Staff Member

    Bozeman, MT
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2013
    Messages:
    5,652
    ok...good to know....didn't think about re-using the inserts 'upside down'. As these knuckles have already been studded etc, don't want to waste them.
     
  10. Jul 17, 2023
    colojeepguy

    colojeepguy Colorado Springs

    At the foot of...
    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    7,178
    It's higher than the leaf spring thats right next to it...not saying it couldn't get hit, but it would have to be a very specifically placed rock.
    It may be the same as a 72-73 Commando, I'm not sure. It's different from the factory Saginaw mount on my 70 Commando.
    The CJ mount has extra bolts that tie into the flat plate on the front of the frame in front of the grille. In my case it attaches to the winch plate.
    And now we've totally derailed your thread about tie rod angles!
     
    Norcal69 likes this.
  11. Jul 17, 2023
    FinoCJ

    FinoCJ 1970 CJ5 Staff Member

    Bozeman, MT
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2013
    Messages:
    5,652
    ok....didn't think that front plate appeared until the 76+, but I am probably wrong. I remember having it on my CJ7....but by then the box mount was the 2 piece stamped metal.

    I got what I needed....I can go ahead and ream the knuckles without concern. If the drag link ends up too high, I can reverse/undo the flip and use the sleeves from the other side. I still think its possible to flip the drag link at the pitman arm, but we can cross that bridge if needed at some later point. I just didn't want to waste a set of good studded knuckles if the flip didn't work out.
     
    colojeepguy likes this.
  12. Jul 17, 2023
    Jw60

    Jw60 Cool school 2024 Sponsor 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    Sedalia MO.
    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Messages:
    4,821
    Mine just needs more lift.
    With the Y linkage if I were to flip the tie rods the drag link is gonna move vertically just the same as the tie rod but the tie rod end will then be wrong sided.

    [​IMG]20230402_184112 by Joe with a jeep, on Flickr
     
    colojeepguy likes this.
  13. Jul 17, 2023
    FinoCJ

    FinoCJ 1970 CJ5 Staff Member

    Bozeman, MT
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2013
    Messages:
    5,652
    nope...well at least on mine, you can keep the Y-linkage with the drag link connecting into the TR on the front side.....just have to turn the TREs 1/2 turn on both side in the same direction (ie one threads in 1/2 turn, the other threads out 1/2 turn (to keep the overall length between them the same).
     
  14. Jul 17, 2023
    colojeepguy

    colojeepguy Colorado Springs

    At the foot of...
    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    7,178
    This bracket (which is now being reproduced) is like the Commando. It just bolts through the frame rail from the side. The frame is boxed & the bolts are long enough to go all th eway through.
    upload_2023-7-17_14-3-0.png

    I dont have a picture of the mount I'm using in the CJ, it looks similar but instead of the horizontal bolts through the frame, if sits in the frame channel & the bolts are vertical.
     
  15. Jul 17, 2023
    colojeepguy

    colojeepguy Colorado Springs

    At the foot of...
    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    7,178
    Are you sure about that? The ones I've seen have the extra hole in one of the TRE's.
     
  16. Jul 17, 2023
    vtxtasy

    vtxtasy oldbee 2024 Sponsor 2023 Sponsor

    Tucson, AZ
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Messages:
    1,462
    There are two styles of TRE with the hole. When flipping the tie rod the reversed TRE is used. A mirrored image.
     
  17. Jul 17, 2023
    Norcal69

    Norcal69 Out of the box thinker 2024 Sponsor 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    Northern California
    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    3,569
    This is the tie rod flip setup that I first ran on my jeep when I did the job.
    I purchased 3 flip bushings; one for each knuckle and one for the rt side TRE.
    The bushing is welded into the TRE.
    I ran this setup on my jeep for a couple years before going to the 2 hole knuckle for more steering leverage.
    Later on we installed this setup on Steve's jeep and he abused it for several years.
    Here it is still attached to the axle housing.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    vtxtasy and Jw60 like this.
  18. Jul 17, 2023
    vtxtasy

    vtxtasy oldbee 2024 Sponsor 2023 Sponsor

    Tucson, AZ
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Messages:
    1,462
    That works depending on the rest of the steering geometry. Nice to have options.
     
  19. Jul 17, 2023
    FinoCJ

    FinoCJ 1970 CJ5 Staff Member

    Bozeman, MT
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2013
    Messages:
    5,652
    FWIW - there are double TRE's that have opposite 'bends' in them if clearance with the drag link connection is an issue....These pics are from Sam at Parts Dude....one TRE is the standard CJ style (which I believe was originally located up near the bellcrank with the OEM double tie rod steering), and the other is a commando double TRE which I believe (?) came with OEM ross box but crossover style steering with the double TRE down by the passenger knuckle - sorta the way most of us have swapped the original CJ style.....so no matter how your set-up, you should be able to get a double TRE that 'bends' the way you need to clear the drag link connection.
    640178.jpg 920536.jpg
     
    blalp!, Buildflycrash, Jw60 and 2 others like this.
  20. Jul 17, 2023
    FinoCJ

    FinoCJ 1970 CJ5 Staff Member

    Bozeman, MT
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2013
    Messages:
    5,652
    For my set up....I currently have the original CJ style double TRE:
    [​IMG]

    With a flipped set-up, I replace that with a commando style double TRE to keep the bend the same, but yes, you do have to ream out the hole on the TRE and use a flip sleeve. But, most TRE flip kits come with 3 sleeves anyway since they expect you are working with a 2 hole knuckle on the passenger side.
     
    Last edited: Jul 17, 2023
    vtxtasy and Norcal69 like this.
New Posts