1. Registration trouble? Please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom right corner of the page and your issue will be resolved.
    Dismiss Notice

V6 between frame blockhugger headers and other exhaust questions

Discussion in 'Early CJ5 and CJ6 Tech' started by fletcher0780, May 5, 2008.

  1. May 5, 2008
    fletcher0780

    fletcher0780 Member

    Connecticut
    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    Messages:
    147
    I just finished about 2 hours of searching and reading, what is the final word on the fitment of block hugger headers for a V6 with factory motor mounts and Ross steering?

    It appears there are two manufacturers, Downey and Sanderson. I called Sanderson and they didn't quite understand my explanation of my stock 67 Jeep with a factory Buick V6 fitted with two passenger side manifolds to clear the Ross steering box. They told me I could order two passenger side headers R)

    If you have actually seen block hugger headers on a stock CJ5 V6, please reply with specifics.

    My engine has just been finished and I'm trying to prepare for my exhaust project, here are my exhaust requirements/ideas:
    -I want to stay away from fender well headers
    -I want a single exit exhaust (thinking about 2.5" to compliment the cam and 4 barrel carb)
    -I'm planning to use a flowmaster 40 or 50 series single in single out muffler
    -I have a shop willing to construct the Y-pipe and exhaust (they did my single 3"/flowmaster 50 series and 92 corvette factory block hugger's on my 77 CJ7 with a built 350) it sounds absolutely awesome :D
    -I'll use the factory manifolds if necessary, but I'm not really fond of the forward facing drivers side manifold. Has anyone ever used a center exit manifold - do they exist???

    I open to suggestions, thanks!
     
  2. May 5, 2008
    Boyink

    Boyink Super Moderator Staff Member

    Tulsa, OK
    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2002
    Messages:
    6,197
    If you're keeping the Ross steering, IMHO keep the factory manifolds. I'm no exhaust expert, but how much gain would you get from headers into a single exhaust over the original setup?
     
  3. May 5, 2008
    fletcher0780

    fletcher0780 Member

    Connecticut
    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    Messages:
    147
    That might be the best option, I was just thinking of making the exhaust neater. I don't imagine that u-turn on the front of the D.S. manifold is very efficient though :)

    From what I've read single exhaust systems are actually more efficient than duals:
    -scavenging effect
    -pressure equalization
    -weight reduction
    -cost savings

    Although, the reasons above don't apply to all vehicles and there are many variables. I'd also mention I personally like the sound of a single system on a SBC better, but duals on a SBF.
     
  4. May 5, 2008
    Boyink

    Boyink Super Moderator Staff Member

    Tulsa, OK
    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2002
    Messages:
    6,197
    Are you keeping the brake MC in the stock location?

    I've a 4.3 and with the exhaust running back as you're wanting to do it makes for a tight area around the master cylinder - with clutch, brakes and exhaust all running within inches of each other.

    I changed out the pivot tube, and there would have been no way to pull the pedals without either cutting the pivot tube off or pulling the exhaust.

    If you are relocating the MC it won't be as big of an issue.
     
  5. May 5, 2008
    jeepin22

    jeepin22 New Member

    Corvallis, Oregon
    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2004
    Messages:
    18
    I didn't think that anybody made block hugger headers that would fit a stock CJ with the Buick 225. My father-in-law has an intermediate CJ-5 that he pieced together with a Buick 225 and he has block hugger headers and full length exhaust inside the frame rails that he had custom made by an exhaust shop (his master cylinder is firewall mounted). It looks pretty sweet but is definitely a tight fit. My guess is that custom headers would be your best bet.
     
  6. May 5, 2008
    michigan_pinstripes

    michigan_pinstripes I'm not lost, I'm wandering

    Clarkston MI...
    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2003
    Messages:
    605
    I think the block huggers are only for "modern" (pre 88 ) tall port EF heads. Besides, if you have a stock or Saginaw steering, I doubt there is room on the left bank. Stock exhaust works great -- if you can find any :rofl: I'm messing with headers right now on the 2A and not too impressed. I'd trade em for a clean stock setup.
     
  7. May 5, 2008
    grannyscj

    grannyscj Headed to the Yukon

    Anchorage, AK
    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2005
    Messages:
    1,758
    Check out my exhaust in the gallery. http://www.earlycj5.com/gallery2/v/picBank/album_008/ It's 2 into 1 stock setup (Rossbox, forward dump manifold) w/ the Flowmaster extreme (heavy duty super 44). It's all contained w/in and tucked up into the frame out of the way. As far as in frame headers go, unless you have a custom set made up you're out of luck. The Ross box negates any rear dump headers and the size of in frame shorties(out from block) makes for a very creative saginaw setup. In fact w/o the skinny driver's side manifold you have some work to do to get around a manifold even. Besides unless you're planning on spending a lot of time in the top 1/4 of the RPM band manifolds are IMO the better choice.YMMV:v6:
     
  8. May 5, 2008
    fletcher0780

    fletcher0780 Member

    Connecticut
    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    Messages:
    147
    That's a very clean looking install! Do you have any more pics of the Y-pipe? What pipe diameter did you go with? What are the spec's on your engine? How's the sound on your system? Any audio clips?
     
  9. May 6, 2008
    grannyscj

    grannyscj Headed to the Yukon

    Anchorage, AK
    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2005
    Messages:
    1,758
    I'll get you some more pics in the morning. It's 2" pipe, stock V6 225. It sounds a lot like a cammed V8 when idling but has a definite V6 sound at speed, pretty quiet in the cab but you can hear it. Sorry no audio clips.:v6:
     
  10. May 6, 2008
    fletcher0780

    fletcher0780 Member

    Connecticut
    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    Messages:
    147
    What is the pipe diameter before the Y, is it two 1.75" into a single 2"? I think I want to go into a single 2.5" pipe after the Y just to help it breathe a bit better with the Edelbrock 500CFM, Offy 360, and Comp 252H.

    That muffler you have looks pretty tough, Do you know how many chambers it has?
     
  11. May 6, 2008
    grannyscj

    grannyscj Headed to the Yukon

    Anchorage, AK
    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2005
    Messages:
    1,758
    It's a 2-chamber muffler. Super 44 w/ a heavy duty case. http://www.flowmastermufflers.com/44_super.html
    Pipe size is up to you, but you'll start losing low end torque if you go much over 2". That said your setup is different than mine and upping the pipe size may work better w/ the bigger carb.:v6:
     
  12. May 6, 2008
    66cj5

    66cj5 Jeep with no name

    NorthWest Indiana
    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2003
    Messages:
    2,084
    why not route the exhaust like a flathead ford :v8: and run the left exhaust over to the right side under the front of the motor and have a "Y" pipe just after the right sde manifold?
     
  13. May 6, 2008
    fletcher0780

    fletcher0780 Member

    Connecticut
    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    Messages:
    147
    :beer: for you, thats a good idea. I'll have to take a look and see how that works, it might get a bit tight near the transfer case.
     
  14. May 11, 2008
    grannyscj

    grannyscj Headed to the Yukon

    Anchorage, AK
    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2005
    Messages:
    1,758
    Last edited: Jun 9, 2008
  15. May 11, 2008
    fletcher0780

    fletcher0780 Member

    Connecticut
    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    Messages:
    147
    You've inspired me, I think I'll copy your system, but with a 2.5" pipe and stainless 50 series muffler.
     
New Posts