1. Registration trouble? Please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom right corner of the page and your issue will be resolved.
    Dismiss Notice

Blown engine??

Discussion in 'Early CJ5 and CJ6 Tech' started by durk, Jan 1, 2007.

  1. Jan 1, 2007
    durk

    durk Member

    Ontario/Canada
    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2005
    Messages:
    206
    Hi there, great site!! I purchased my jeep after the P/O let it have a massive heart attack (thrown connecting rod through the drivers side of the 225 block). I'm assuming that gapping hole on the side of the block aswell as the inner carnage makes it unuseable. So the question being, whats my best option to getting a buick V6 back in my jeep? Do I go 225 or 231, with an interchangeablity of parts combination? Any suggestion would be great.
    Thanks J
     
  2. Jan 1, 2007
    Posimoto

    Posimoto Hopeless JEEP Addict

    Minden, Nevada
    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2003
    Messages:
    4,539
    A 231 will be the easiest to find. Get a complete engine if you can. I don't know how much interchange there is between the 225 and the 231.
     
  3. Jan 4, 2007
    durk

    durk Member

    Ontario/Canada
    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2005
    Messages:
    206
    Thanks for the reply, I guess it's off to the wreckers or the junk papers for and old 231 v6. Funny I was looking at a new 4-cylinder Mitsubishi diesel that powered a genny I was wirrring up today and couldn't help thinking it sure look like it would fit nicely into old red.
    J
     
  4. Jan 4, 2007
    trickpatrick

    trickpatrick Done? LOL

    North Idaho USA
    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2006
    Messages:
    838
    Chevy has a new 5 cylinder that look interesting too.
    but really your best bet is a..... just my .02 cents here...
    I dont have a motor in yet and have thought about this for 2 years.

    Buick odd fire would be good, 231 easier to find in a donor..

    Vortec v6 with TBI is a really smart choice.
    There easy to find and shorter and lighter and twice the power of the original.. plus fuel injection is really safer in a 4x4.
    I have both too chose from and cant make up my mind.

    I do think diesel is too much effort for what it would bring to the table.
    And a V8 is just 2 heavy when a v6 would give you plenty of torque for a jeep.

    I have a 383 SBC sitting but I wont put it in.:(
     
  5. Jan 4, 2007
    durk

    durk Member

    Ontario/Canada
    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2005
    Messages:
    206
    Hey, your right a little stock 1/4 ton jeep doesn't need a v8, but as for the desel 4 banger it looked light, everything was pretty much self-contained as it was mounted to the engine, the bell housing even looked like it could be easily delt with.

    But whats the deal with the GM 4.3 v6? I'm not really into the fuelly thing, though I did a 5.0 liter fuelly into a '67 mustang (dads car). I like the KISS theory less to go wrong the better you know. So is there a stock GM part intake for the block that will convert to Carb? Will the block bolt up to the T-14 without a visit to AA or Novak..
    Any suggestion would be helpful thanks.
    J
     
  6. Jan 5, 2007
    toolbox

    toolbox If you get bored, I've got the projects.

    Hamilton, Montana
    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    347
    I'd go with EFI on a 4.3 if at all possible. Easiest way is probably either buying a wrecked rig and getting everything you need, or maybe getting it from a junkyard. It looks like Edelbrock makes a carb manifold for the 4.3 FI http://www.edelbrock.com/automotive_new/mc/manifolds/chevy_v6_perf.shtml
     
  7. Jan 5, 2007
    jeepen

    jeepen Member

    Spokane WA
    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2006
    Messages:
    110
    If I had the $$ I would go with the 4.3. It takes all 350 parts internal just 2 less well all most. if you are afraid of the wiring ck out a painless harness the make it easy. the TIP injection is verry reliable and time tested. To get a good running 4.3 and put in in probly wont cost much more than bying a 231 or 225 and rebuilding it. I would realy look in to it. A
    Deisal is noisy and smells the extra torque is not worth it I dont think that comming from a deisal tec. working on them for 15+ years.
    but that is just my 2 cents worth.
    The morst important thing is what you will be happy with good luck with your project stick with it and have fun.
     
  8. Jan 5, 2007
    mb82

    mb82 I feel great!

    Charlottesville Va
    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2003
    Messages:
    2,706
    Yes you can get carbs for the older 4.3s they are the same as the 3.8L 90deg chevy v-6s( not buick) Boyink has one so do I but I plan on swapping in FI ASAP once I get chia on the road.
     
  9. Jan 5, 2007
    jhuey

    jhuey Michigan Jeeper!

    Indian River...
    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2004
    Messages:
    415
    225's are out there, I have had no issues getting parts. I would think swaping a fresh 225 would be the simplest and cheapest. It would bolt right in!
    My.02
     
  10. Jan 5, 2007
    timgr

    timgr We stand on the shoulders of giants. 2022 Sponsor

    Medford Mass USA
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Messages:
    23,596
    For a 4.3L you'll have to change the frame mounts and maybe dent the firewall to clear the distributor. The Jeep/Buick V6s have a front-mounted distributor, and the rear mounted distributor on the 4.3L could get in the way. That is, if you don't move the drivetrain around.

    The 4.3L can be had with MPI or TBI, but you can convert the 225/231 to TBI pretty easily, even the oddfire engines.

    I'd say look around and find a good deal on a 225/231, unless you really want the 4.3L. Owners like the exhaust note of the 225 (or OF 231) - it's distinctive. Plus the oddfire flywheel is really heavy, which likely helps the reputation for great chug-factor that these engines have.
     
  11. Jan 5, 2007
    jplumb

    jplumb Her tractor first, now...

    Haxtun, Colorado
    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2006
    Messages:
    35
    The p/o of my '59 had left the heads off of the 231 oddfire for the last 12-15 years...so needless to say it is stuck. The bellhousing that was on there (231-t-90) bolted right up to the 4.3 chevy from an '85 astro van I found at the junkyard. It is carburated so the only real changes that will have to be made are with the wiring and possibly the fuel. The mounts were broken anyway so not a big concern having to move them around as well. The 4.3 is also very close to the same length so there won't be much need to change drivetrain lengths either. Go with the 4.3 unless you want to keep this an original...or close to.
     
  12. Jan 5, 2007
    jplumb

    jplumb Her tractor first, now...

    Haxtun, Colorado
    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2006
    Messages:
    35
    After posting I realized that I mis-spoke. The CHEVY bellhousing bolted right up to the adapter that was on the t-90 from the 231 bellhousing. Clear as mud???
     
  13. Jan 5, 2007
    Bucket of Bolts

    Bucket of Bolts Broke Member

    Dinuba, Ca.
    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Messages:
    60
    Going to the EFI engine probably is a big improvement, but For me personally, I would run the 231. or 225 if I could find one.
     
  14. Jan 5, 2007
    1960willyscj5

    1960willyscj5 Well-Known Member

    Mesa, Arizona
    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2006
    Messages:
    2,793
    R) From way out in left field, how about the 3.7 litre dodge dakota engine?

    That's about 225 ci, according to my owners manual.:coffee:
     
New Posts