1. Registration trouble? Please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom right corner of the page and your issue will be resolved.
    Dismiss Notice

Help Date This Old Cj5…

Discussion in 'Early Jeep Restoration and Research' started by Ric-san, Feb 2, 2022.

  1. Ric-san

    Ric-san New Member

    F766FD8E-8C4A-4924-AF07-EA503521059A.jpeg

    So the backstory is a coworker friend is set to inherit his father in laws old CJ-5. It’s in Wyoming, we’re in the Florida panhandle. One pic only so far and if memory serves him right he recalls his family saying it’s a 1960’s Jeep. As soon as he finds more info, I’ll update this posting…
     
    Alan28 likes this.
  2. maurywhurt

    maurywhurt Member 2024 Sponsor 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    If I'm not mistaken, I believe the battery cover on the passenger side of the cowl disappeared after 1963. If so, that would be the most recent model year this Jeep could be, though it might date from anywhere in the 1955-63 time frame.
     
    Beach66Bum and Ric-san like this.
  3. Howard Eisenhauer

    Howard Eisenhauer Administrator Staff Member

    Mid to late 50's by the parking lights.
     
    maurywhurt likes this.
  4. mickeykelley

    mickeykelley Well-Known Member

    Yes on both the battery cover and parking lights. Looking at the rear view mirror, it looks a little too small to be the 50’s but hard to tell. You need to get a pic of the serial number plate that is attached to the firewall under the hood on the drivers side. That will have numbers that can tell you for sure. These things have been so modified over the years that some times it’s hard to tell without lots of data points. You can see the edge of it on mine (‘58) in the upper right of the pic below.

    208A6E8A-3D8F-4E15-90DF-B092D0D2ED27.jpeg
     
    Last edited: Feb 2, 2022
  5. Glenn

    Glenn Kinda grumpy old man Staff Member

    Are you guys thinking those are the larger or smaller of the clear lights? To me they look like the smaller ones.
     
  6. Alan28

    Alan28 Well-Known Member 2022 Sponsor

    Looks like a very nice Jeep, czan become very very nice indeed. Congrats.
     
  7. mickeykelley

    mickeykelley Well-Known Member

    Last edited: Feb 2, 2022
  8. Howard Eisenhauer

    Howard Eisenhauer Administrator Staff Member

    I'm thinking '55-'58 from the shape of the bezels,but it is hard to tell.
     
  9. Howard Eisenhauer

    Howard Eisenhauer Administrator Staff Member

    There were two types of the smaller clear lenses - '55 to '57 and a slightly different type that was even a bit smaller from '58 to '64-ish.
     
    Glenn likes this.
  10. Glenn

    Glenn Kinda grumpy old man Staff Member

    My 3B has the slightly larger clear lenses, which I think are incorrect for the year, '59. The smaller yet ones are more bullet shaped due to the smaller diameter, these are on my CJ5 and wagon. I agree with it being hard to tell in the picture but I do think those are the smaller ones.
     
  11. Ric-san

    Ric-san New Member

    My co-worker got a pic of the vin tag… I’m deciding it as a 1955
     

    Attached Files:

  12. PeteL

    PeteL If it wasn't for physics, and law enforcement... 2024 Sponsor 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    Speedometer face can be a big clue to dating during first CJ5 years.

    And the heater location was under-dash on the passenger side in the beginning. Heater optional.
     
  13. Glenn

    Glenn Kinda grumpy old man Staff Member

    Nope, it's a '60. It's a little less than 450 units older than mine.
     
    Ric-san and Zoomer like this.
  14. Zoomer

    Zoomer eJeeper (walking)

    Manufactured March 1960.
     
    Ric-san and Glenn like this.
  15. Ric-san

    Ric-san New Member

    I passed along the info…
     
    Glenn likes this.
  16. Glenn

    Glenn Kinda grumpy old man Staff Member

    Cool! I'm curious about the bracing on the passenger door. Was it designed to mount something on it?
     
  17. PeteL

    PeteL If it wasn't for physics, and law enforcement... 2024 Sponsor 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    Looks like field modification to me, as if the door was too "floppy" or something.
     
  18. Glenn

    Glenn Kinda grumpy old man Staff Member

    Yeah, I was thinking maybe for strengthening it. It's actually nicely done as far as functional looking.
     
  19. Boyink

    Boyink Super Moderator Staff Member

    Maybe it's a sliding window....
     
  20. PeteL

    PeteL If it wasn't for physics, and law enforcement... 2024 Sponsor 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    It made me think of Mitch Hedburg...

    "Don't get in a fight with your girlfriend when you are camping - it's really hard to slam the door on a tent."