• Registration trouble? Please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom right corner of the page and your issue will be resolved.

Anyone regret adding power steering?

Is the Corvette gear variable ratio?
The 4x4 S10 gear I mentioned above is.
Relaxed ratio near center, faster away from center.
NB the modern gears like the S10 type are more durable than those from '70s cars for instance.
Wagoneer owners report picking an S10 gear from the yards and bolting in, with no additional service.
 
Most modern power Saginaw boxes have the variable ratio, to which Tim refers.
Just a follow up to my earlier response; I have a completely overhauled D30 axle with new ball joints, tie rod ends, HD tie rod & drag link and Flaming River steering shaft.
 
Is the Corvette gear variable ratio?
The 4x4 S10 gear I mentioned above is.
Relaxed ratio near center, faster away from center.
NB the modern gears like the S10 type are more durable than those from '70s cars for instance.
Wagoneer owners report picking an S10 gear from the yards and bolting in, with no additional service.
The manual C3 Corvette box is straight 16:1. There are variable integral aftermarket power boxes available with the same mounting.
 
Why do you regret it? Please elaborate.
See this:

Basically, I don't like the mushy, no road feel of most 70s style saggy power boxes. I currently have it in the 58 wagon, and even with 6 degree caster shims, toe in set at 1/4", 2 hole knuckle (OEM set-up for wagons), all new TRE's and linkages, new column and intermediate shaft, its just not a great on road feel. I am currently commuting 40 miles roundtrip in the 58 everyday on beautiful winding backroads - would be nice if the handling was better (some suspension mods might also help). Wondering if maybe I have a bit too much toe - maybe open that up just a bit? I also swapped the manual saggy box to a power box in my lifted CJ7 many years ago - same result: crappy road feel. I also had OEM power box in my YJ - it was probably the best, but it also was pretty much stock and the on road handling is much better to start with.

Anyway, As many of you know, I still run the manual ross box on my cj5, but with a 1-piece TR and double hole TRE. Despite all the slop, it has better road feel than an power saggy set up that I've used - I much prefer the manual feel on road. Off road, as long as the front diff was open, I didn't mind the lack of power, except occasionally on very boulder strewn trails (like the rubicon) where the tires jam between the big rocks. Typically, that could be worked around by turning on top of the rocks and rocking when needed. Once the front locker went in, then yes, I'd probably prefer power off-road - especially given with a D27 the only locker option is a lock-rite, so no ability to 'turn it off' when not needed. But I drive my jeep on road a lot as well, and that means trying to find a sweet spot that works both on and off road. So my current plan (which is for me, and not necessarily promoted to anyone else), is to swap to a manual saggy box (keeping the large OEM wheel) which should both help get the slop back to manageable, help with reducing steering effort (23:1 vs 17:1 for the ross), as well as go to a 2-hole knuckle to again help with mechanical advantage, and finally, add a twin stick front cap to the D18 so that I can run in 2lo (thus de-activating the auto locker) for mellow sections of trails, or tight switchbacks etc.

Of course, I am trying to hedge my bets here....as in, things like a 2-hole knuckle and twin stick conversion are good things to have no matter what steering one uses. Also, if I do decide the manual saggy just isn't going to work, I want the option to go power without massive refabrication. With the power box just a longer in front of the sector shaft, I am using a junkyard box to help place the saggy mount (I have rectangular tubing front cross-member just behind the bumper that makes space a bit tight) so it will work with either box.

So let the complaining begin....I do stupid stuff all the time and build my jeep with tractor feel.....I am okay with that, but it might not be what others want. They also might not like the 4:1 T18 that is going in instead of the 6:1.....hopefully my jeep will run again one day, but most likely it will be junk, just like it is now.
 
Last edited:
Basically, I don't like the mushy, no road feel of most 70s style saggy power boxes.

You know the power steering is really only needed off road in the hard rocks & while parallel parking at the Dairy Queen. :)

The issue I believe is that power steering setups perform like an active steering damper- they push back on the little bump & dip induced strains on the steering gear that communicate to your hands what's happening.

When I disconnect my pump the steering feel goes straight back to stock & wheel returns to straight on it's own.

I have considered putting a solenoid bypass valve across the lines to redirect flow from the steering gear when not needed. Maybe someday :/
 
The issue I believe is that power steering setups perform like an active steering damper- they push back on the little bump & dip induced strains on the steering gear that communicate to your hands what's happening.
I have never used a steering damper with the PS system in the 3B for that reason. And yes, it does eliminate some feedback, most especially in the rocks where that is very welcome. That said, I have never felt the system was mushy. Essentially the exact opposite. Near zero play, very precise, and it does function very well at 100 mph, not that I'm inclined to test that again.
 
I agree with most of what Duffer says, but it will be a while, if ever, before I will feel comfortable with power steering in a Jeep again. That was a discombobulating experience.

Like I said, I don't do any hard core rock crawling, and don't intend to start. That said, yes manual steering can be a little hard to manage even in moderate rocks, and just about any trail worth going on will have some rough spots. Kick back can cause some serious pain, and even injury, to your fingers or thumb until you learn how to keep them out of the way which is a lesson that comes real quick first time. When I am going through rough stuff I grip the wheel without any of my digits wrapped around where they can get hit by the spokes. When the wheel kicks back I let it slide through my hands, been doing this for more than 50 years with old Jeeps having the Ross steering, and haven't broken a finger since 1981, which was the lesson I mentioned.
 
A caveat, or two, to go with my opinion on this.

My main use of a Jeep is getting to the places I like to fish for trout. This usually involves Forestry service roads, which are decently maintained, and a few stream crossings, but nothing really difficult. I occasionally go on organized trail rides with groups, such as the Fall Color Tour in Colorado, but select the "Green" trails most of the time. I go on trail rides at Willys Reunions, and places like the off road area near me called "Windrock", but I don't do the white knuckle stuff anymore, I am the guy who uses the bypass around difficult obstacles. I am more interested in seeing beautiful places, than I am in bouncing around my old bag of bones. I think manual Saginaw steering will serve my purposes just fine.
 
I suppose I could just go back to manual travel and just walk..

I love steering and power brakes. The Ross box was annoying at best.

Do whatever you like but I have no regrets and honestly, getting the old junk replaced with antique power steering has been a dream.
 
The FrankenJeep (‘72 CJ5) has power steering. The pump is a stock 2005 GM on the 5.3 and the gearbox is a Saginaw from (the seller said) a 1980s Camaro. It’s almost four turns lock-to-lock (3-3/4), and works well.

Unlike some steering - say a 1970s Buick - this has a decent ‘feel’ back to the wheel. That wheel is an aftermarket 16” unit, and with the manual box was way too hard to turn when slow or stopped.

I wouldn’t go back to manual steering on anything I own. The Willys Wagon will get Saginaw power steering when it gets new axles - soon.

Jon B.
 
I love steering and power brakes. ...
Agree, I wonder what is expected of power steering.
These Jeeps are not sports cars - I don't think 'overboosted' or not matters that much.
Meh - being able to palm the wheel and maneuver easily greatly appeals to me.
I'd want power brakes, but that's where I would worry about overboosting.
Ideally I'd want my brakes to be smooth, even and responsive; boost just enough so driving around town does not fatigue.
 
I have had/driven a number of Jeeps with the Ross steering. They were "OK" with stock tires and basic driving. Everyone I've encountered felt sloppy and vague compared to a vehicle with a front mounted box.

I bought my CJ with a manual Saggy box. It was "all right". The one big disadvantage was it would "kick back" from time to time while wheeling. I upgraded to power steering and have never been happier.
Matching the pump to the box is important.
The one complaint on mine is the steering is simply too light. While it isn't worth my effort, a lower pressure pump or one that moves less fluid would help.
 
Another option is manual saginaw with hydro assist. I am running that on snowshoe and it works great.
That is what the system on my 3B is. Extra hoses and the inherent potential for more leaks but in the 4 1/2 decades I've used the separate control valve/assist cylinder, that has never been a problem. The largest advantage of that system is it removes almost all the loading from the sector box and its mounting. I mounted the assist cylinder directly on the axle for the last iteration so only the tie rod sees any load. Almost like full hydro steering but without the disconnect from "road feel".
 
That is what the system on my 3B is. Extra hoses and the inherent potential for more leaks but in the 4 1/2 decades I've used the separate control valve/assist cylinder, that has never been a problem. The largest advantage of that system is it removes almost all the loading from the sector box and its mounting. I mounted the assist cylinder directly on the axle for the last iteration so only the tie rod sees any load. Almost like full hydro steering but without the disconnect from "road feel".

Same reason I went this route for snowshoe. The tracks add more stress to the steering, so I put the cylinder on the axle and connected it to the tie rod.
 
Back
Top