1. Registration trouble? Please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom right corner of the page and your issue will be resolved.
    Dismiss Notice

Rebuilding "Cream Puff"

Discussion in 'Builds and Fabricators Forum' started by jayhawkclint, Aug 12, 2007.

  1. Sep 4, 2007
    Rondog

    Rondog just hangin' out

    Parker, CO
    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2005
    Messages:
    2,918
    Lookin' good Clint! Where'd you get the wheels? Are they 4-1/2" M38 wheels, or 5" truck?
     
  2. Sep 4, 2007
    jayhawkclint

    jayhawkclint ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Oklahoma City, USA
    Joined:
    May 18, 2006
    Messages:
    2,622
    Thanks, Ron. They're actually 16x6. I bought them off KansasJeeper, who bought them off a guy that swore they came from an a1. Says it belonged to his dad who got it at surplus from a fire dept and then kept it for farm use for something like 30yrs. I dunno what they're from.

    Here's a frame pic, first coat not quite finished, still needs flipped:
    [​IMG]
     
  3. Sep 4, 2007
    Rondog

    Rondog just hangin' out

    Parker, CO
    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2005
    Messages:
    2,918
    Are you measuring the wheels outside edge to outside edge? Or inside to inside? The correct way is inside to inside, if that's 4-1/2" they could very well be A1 wheels. The little 1/8" hole on the flanges means they're either military or pickup wheels, 4-1/2" is military and 5" is truck. If they're A1's, must have been an early one.

    The later A1 wheels had little flat areas where the center part dish met the outer rim, same as the CJ5 wheels. The early A1's and M38's had fully curved dishes out to the rim, just like the CJ2A and 3A wheels.

    Also, do they have safety beads? That's a sure way to tell military wheels.
     
  4. Sep 4, 2007
    jayhawkclint

    jayhawkclint ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Oklahoma City, USA
    Joined:
    May 18, 2006
    Messages:
    2,622
    Can you spot the rookie here? :oops:

    Looks like I've got a mix. 4 are 5", and my spare and a 6th wheel not pictured are 4-1/2". Not sure how to spot a safety bead. In the night picture above with the row of 4 wheels sitting on the plywood on the ground, the 2nd wheel from left to right is my 4-1/2".
     
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2007
  5. Sep 5, 2007
    Rondog

    Rondog just hangin' out

    Parker, CO
    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2005
    Messages:
    2,918
    Safety bead is the raised portion circled in this photo, around the inside of the rim (ignore the text, old comment...too lazy to erase it). Helps to keep flat/low tires from coming off, I guess. One o' them military things. The 5" rims are most likely truck rims.

    [​IMG]
     
  6. Sep 5, 2007
    Lieutenant Mike

    Lieutenant Mike Firefighter Mike

    Boaz AL
    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2005
    Messages:
    313
    Man you work fast. Looking great.
     
  7. Sep 5, 2007
    jayhawkclint

    jayhawkclint ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Oklahoma City, USA
    Joined:
    May 18, 2006
    Messages:
    2,622
    Thanks.

    Ron, looks like I've got two with the safety bead (4-1/2") and four without (5"). I'm putting the 5" on the JEEP and using one of the 4-1/2" as the spare.
     
  8. Sep 30, 2007
    jayhawkclint

    jayhawkclint ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Oklahoma City, USA
    Joined:
    May 18, 2006
    Messages:
    2,622
    Welp, this project came to a screeching halt tonight. :mad:

    I've done a "little" cutting to the floor pans. Not much left of the tub:
    [​IMG]

    Just a "wee bit" of daylight showing through: :rofl:
    [​IMG]

    Took the F-head apart. Was concerned when I found the water neck cracked in half. Couldn't have held too much coolant that way.
    [​IMG]

    So I confirmed my fears when I removed the head and found that my supposedly "ran good when parked" F-head has a deep fissure completely through #1 & #2 cylinders. What really sucks is that I have to heave this pig into the back of the pickup now to get it to the scrap yard.
    [​IMG]

    So, now I'm not sure where to go with this project. I've got a rolling chassis and an okay looking front clip, but that's about it. I'm thinking at this point that it is going to either be a resto-mod, or it's going to be parts. Flip of the coin as to which. I've got a 4.3L EFI sitting in the driveway and an SM465 in the shed that have both been begging me for a home. Only thing is, I've already basically got that JEEP with my '70. I really wanted something original looking that I could just cruise around, take to the car shows, Midwest Willys Reunion, etc. Kinda bummed.
     
  9. Oct 1, 2007
    bkd

    bkd Moderator Supreme Staff Member 2022 Sponsor

    K-Town Tenn.
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2007
    Messages:
    3,294
    :( Clint that sucks, let us know what you decide.
    Jim S.
     
  10. Oct 1, 2007
    jd7

    jd7 Sponsor

    Nacogdoches,Texas
    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,745
  11. Oct 1, 2007
    Boyink

    Boyink Super Moderator Staff Member

    Tulsa, OK
    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2002
    Messages:
    6,197
    That does suck.

    I guess if it were me I wouldn't change direction - no sense building what you really don't want. I'd work with what's good - get the frame etc all done and re-assembled, then set it aside and wait for the right deal on the rest of the parts you need.
     
  12. Oct 1, 2007
    jayhawkclint

    jayhawkclint ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Oklahoma City, USA
    Joined:
    May 18, 2006
    Messages:
    2,622
    Okay, slept on it. So, correct me if I'm wrong, but just eyeballing the frame it looks as if a 4.3L conversion would interfere with the batt tray on the '63 frame. Not sure what year they switched, but my '70 has the batt up on the firewall. This one is down by the front shock mount on the pass side. I'm thinking that pretty much narrows my choices down to either:

    a) another F-head
    b) part out
    c) can full of gas and a handful of matches

    -Or- ...and this would definitely be breaking away from the OE path, but still might be a fun project... A guy in my local Jeep club pulled a complete 2.5L drivetrain out of his '97 TJ in order to do a 4.0L conversion. I think it is EFI. Just wants it out of his garage for $100. Blasphemy to even consider putting it in the '63?
     
    Last edited: Oct 1, 2007
  13. Oct 1, 2007
    Boyink

    Boyink Super Moderator Staff Member

    Tulsa, OK
    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2002
    Messages:
    6,197
    *Shrug* a cutoff wheel will take care of the battery tray issue - SSDutch has had that surgery..;)

    But I think the FI 4cyl would be way cooler - definitely unusual. Stick a granny low 4sp in, lockers and keep it wrapped in a stock looking exterior and go have fun on the trail or at the Willys Reunion.
     
  14. Oct 1, 2007
    jd7

    jd7 Sponsor

    Nacogdoches,Texas
    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,745
    ..now that piques my intrest...in my book has a deffinate cool factor...origional looks and modern 4 cyl drivetrain....price is hard to pass up too....
     
  15. Oct 1, 2007
    Jack Frost

    Jack Frost Member

    Mineral, VA
    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    114
    I'll be pulling my F-134/T90 out this winter or in the spring, but that may be too far off for ya.

    Love the idea of a new 4 banger in that... Will you have interference with the newer transmission being too long?
     
  16. Oct 1, 2007
    sparky

    sparky Sandgroper Staff Member Founder

    Perth, WA
    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2002
    Messages:
    9,221
    It'll mate to an SM420/465 with the right bellhousing. There's a writeup on the web about putting one in a YJ 4 banger.

    I've often thought it'd be a sweet setup.

    The 2.5L is a nice little engine, worked well for me off-road.

    I think it would be neat to see.
     
  17. Oct 1, 2007
    jd7

    jd7 Sponsor

    Nacogdoches,Texas
    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,745
  18. Oct 1, 2007
    sparky

    sparky Sandgroper Staff Member Founder

    Perth, WA
    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2002
    Messages:
    9,221
    Didn't know Novak made a "kit" to do that.

    The article I was referring to was a DYI approach with an S-10 bellhousing.
     
  19. Oct 1, 2007
    jayhawkclint

    jayhawkclint ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Oklahoma City, USA
    Joined:
    May 18, 2006
    Messages:
    2,622
    Dernit. I was hoping you guys would vote for choice "c" above.

    Interesting. So I guess I had always figured the TJ 2.5L used either an AMC pattern, or an SBC pattern, but the write-up Sparky was speaking of says 60deg.
    http://www.offroaders.com/tech/jeep/transmission-conversion-Swapping_a_SM420_into_a_YJ.htm

    I've been saving an old T-150 bell just for such an occasion, but I guess it won't work for this motor, even though the motor was designed in the AMC era? :?

    Also forgot about CPS. Didn't even consider the starter hitting. Hmmm...
     
  20. Oct 1, 2007
    sparky

    sparky Sandgroper Staff Member Founder

    Perth, WA
    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2002
    Messages:
    9,221
    Remember when AMC designed the 2.5L it was when they were designing the XJ and they used the 2.8L V6.
     
New Posts