1. Registration trouble? Please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom right corner of the page and your issue will be resolved.
    Dismiss Notice

F-Head Clutch Sizes

Discussion in 'Early CJ5 and CJ6 Tech' started by ITLKSEZ, Oct 24, 2017.

  1. Oct 24, 2017
    ITLKSEZ

    ITLKSEZ Hope for the best, prepare for the worst

    Spokane Valley, WA
    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2015
    Messages:
    6,674
    I'm reassembling my 3b's engine and just realized the clutch kit I got is an 8 1/2" diameter, and the one that was on it was 9 1/4". The different pressure plates use two seperate sets of holes in the flywheel. I didn't even think to measure before I ordered, and rock auto only offered one size for my application.

    What application was the larger diameter for? Trucks and wagons?

    I wish I would have looked into this deeper beforehand; I definitely would have opted for the larger diameter for how hard I abuse this thing. :(

    I swear I've forgotten more about these things than I still know.
     
  2. Oct 24, 2017
    Howard Eisenhauer

    Howard Eisenhauer Administrator Staff Member

    Tantallon, Nova...
    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    8,118
    The 9" was a "heavy duty" option for CJs.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  3. Oct 24, 2017
    dozerjim

    dozerjim Member

    western New York
    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Messages:
    974
    Hang on ...it doesn't get any better.
     
    Glenn likes this.
  4. Oct 24, 2017
    PeteL

    PeteL If it wasn't for physics, and law enforcement... 2024 Sponsor 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    Hills of NH
    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2003
    Messages:
    9,805
    My buddy… "If only I knew then what I know now."

    Me…. "If only I knew now what I knew then!"
     
    Glenn likes this.
  5. Oct 24, 2017
    Glenn

    Glenn Kinda grumpy old man Staff Member

    Apopka, Fl
    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2002
    Messages:
    12,375
    I've gained a lot of knowledge over the years.....problem is I have no idea where I put it.
     
    cadwelder and jpflat2a like this.
  6. Oct 24, 2017
    Daryl

    Daryl Sponsor

    Bonney Lake, WA
    Joined:
    May 25, 2006
    Messages:
    2,880
    I "used to could" is pretty much my life these days.
     
    dozerjim likes this.
  7. Oct 24, 2017
    Keys5a

    Keys5a Sponsor

    Florida Keys
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2014
    Messages:
    4,188
    The Kaiser-era CJ's came with the larger clutch on the F134, including the last year ('64) of the 3B. Most of these also had a dual bolt pattern on the flywheel for either clutch size. I always preferred the 9 1/4", but have never seen the larger pressure plate in Howard's photo in post#2.
    -Donny
     
    ronnie victor likes this.
  8. Oct 24, 2017
    ITLKSEZ

    ITLKSEZ Hope for the best, prepare for the worst

    Spokane Valley, WA
    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2015
    Messages:
    6,674
    I have no idea what this engine came out of originally. I can't even remember buying it. It went in after I made a hot-rod out of the last F-head and cooked that one.

    Come to think of it, I swapped a V-6 in a '65 CJ5 back in the day around that time; maybe this is the 134 that came out of that.

    I just searched Rockauto for a '65 CJ5, and there it is: an optional 9 1/4" clutch kit. :mad:
     
  9. Oct 24, 2017
    oldtime

    oldtime oldtime

    St. Charles,...
    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2006
    Messages:
    3,479
    9-1/4" Auburn clutch became an option for all 134's in March of 1961.
    This same clutch became the CJ standard just a couple years later.
    This implies that all post 1962 Willys 134 flywheels are drilled to accept both clutch diameters.
    Early flywheels can easily be machined to accept the 9-1/4" clutches.
     
  10. Oct 25, 2017
    Mark Wahlster

    Mark Wahlster Member

    Silverton, OR
    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2015
    Messages:
    386
    Oldtime is correct. I have done extensive research on this as I am changing my drive train to the larger 9.25" clutch
     
  11. Oct 25, 2017
    jeepermc

    jeepermc Active Member

    Western WA
    Joined:
    May 25, 2011
    Messages:
    1,192
    There were also different size flywheels. My FC-150 that was passed down from my Grandfather had an issue where the starter wouldn't engage the flywheel. Once we dug back into it (long after Grandpa had passed) we found a smaller diameter flywheel that was a good 1/2-3/4 inch away from the starter. Grabbed a flywheel from an F-head that came out of a late 3B and voila! she cranked and fired.
     
  12. Oct 25, 2017
    Keys5a

    Keys5a Sponsor

    Florida Keys
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2014
    Messages:
    4,188
    I've run across a smaller diameter flywheel (by about 1") on an F134 that came out of a military forklift. Maybe this is what your grandfather's FC had?
    -Donny
     
  13. Oct 26, 2017
    oldtime

    oldtime oldtime

    St. Charles,...
    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2006
    Messages:
    3,479
    Only 3 versions of flywheels were ever used on 134 CJ's.
    The Earliest was same as MB GPW #A-1443.
    That one has the timing marks upon it.
    The next version # 804314 came out with 1953 3B and no longer has any timing marks.
    The latest version came out in 1961 and is identical to previous excepting it has 6 extra holes to accept the 9-1/4" clutch cover pattern.
     
  14. Oct 26, 2017
    Keys5a

    Keys5a Sponsor

    Florida Keys
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2014
    Messages:
    4,188
    For what its worth, I think I remember the starter on the military forklift extended behind the engine (top/center) instead of along side, similar to some marine applications. I'm not stating it was a Jeep flywheel, but that it was a smaller diameter flywheel on a Jeep-based engine. That engine also had close to 1/4" endplay on the crankshaft; the thrust (main) bearing was completely worn out, and the crank was way out of spec on the thrust surface.
    -Donny
     
  15. Oct 27, 2017
    Mark Wahlster

    Mark Wahlster Member

    Silverton, OR
    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2015
    Messages:
    386
    The 97 tooth compared to the 129 tooth ring gear might make the flywheel appear different diameters.
     
  16. Oct 27, 2017
    jeepermc

    jeepermc Active Member

    Western WA
    Joined:
    May 25, 2011
    Messages:
    1,192
    We surmised that it came from an industrial application of some sort. I've got a photo somewhere of the two.
     
  17. Oct 27, 2017
    jeepermc

    jeepermc Active Member

    Western WA
    Joined:
    May 25, 2011
    Messages:
    1,192
    I found the photo I have of the two. It does actually look like it could be the ring gear that's the difference. Been so long ago now, that I'm not completely sure what made us decide the entire flywheel was different, rather than just the ring gear.
     
New Posts