1. Registration trouble? Please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom right corner of the page and your issue will be resolved.
    Dismiss Notice

Early Vs Intermediate Difference

Discussion in 'Intermediate CJ-5/6/7/8' started by Cowboyjeeper, Mar 6, 2019.

  1. Mar 6, 2019
    Cowboyjeeper

    Cowboyjeeper Member

    Show low az
    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2019
    Messages:
    473
    I’m sure this has been beat to death but I’ve searched and gone through quite a few pages. I need some info is the extra few inches on the intermediate really that big of a deal. I like the v6 but some good upgrades came stock on intermediates.
    I’m familiar with the little jeeps and a tj we had for a while. I’m leaning towards a early cj but would like some thoughts.
    I’m not afraid to turn a wrench either.

    Thanks in advance for your inputs/expertise
     
  2. Mar 6, 2019
    PeteL

    PeteL If it wasn't for physics, and law enforcement... 2024 Sponsor 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    Hills of NH
    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2003
    Messages:
    9,806
    Basically that was inserted to allow a straight-six 258 engine.
     
  3. Mar 6, 2019
    Cowboyjeeper

    Cowboyjeeper Member

    Show low az
    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2019
    Messages:
    473
    Ok i had found that in my search but does it make a big enough difference on trails and such to even be a factor? I had noticed that my little Willy’s was way better than our tj in the tight stuff, I know apples to oranges, I can’t see that few inches being to big of a deal
     
  4. Mar 6, 2019
    Dave B

    Dave B Frankenjeep '67

    Northern Minnesota
    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2009
    Messages:
    651
    Like PeteL says^^^

    They say---For 1972, A new box-frame, featuring six cross-members for rigidity, was lengthened by 3" to accommodate American Motor's six-cylinder engine. Fenders and hood were also lengthened. AMC wanted to use the inline 6.
     
  5. Mar 6, 2019
    Cowboyjeeper

    Cowboyjeeper Member

    Show low az
    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2019
    Messages:
    473
    Ok the info on the frame is news to me and interesting. Is the amc inline motor the predicessor to the 4.0
     
  6. Mar 6, 2019
    mike starck

    mike starck Member

    salem,oregon
    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Messages:
    762
    As was said longer wheel base for inline six and V-8 ,power steering and brakes option, Dana 20 transfer case,Dana 30 front axle,11 in. brakes.Carry over from 1971 was flanged rear axle and rear mounted fuel tank. Happy Hunting .
     
  7. Mar 6, 2019
    timgr

    timgr We stand on the shoulders of giants. 2022 Sponsor

    Medford Mass USA
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Messages:
    23,596
    AMC bought Jeep, and they had their own line of engines. They needed the longer engine compartment to accommodate an inline 6. Their inline 6 is an excellent engine, and the later 4.0L was a continuation of it. The fenders are an extra 5" longer, though the frame is 3" longer, so the front lip of the fender is 2" further forward of the axle than in 1971.

    At the time, they also upgraded most of the systems that Jeepers had been modifying in their Jeeps - better brakes, better steering. The GM Saginaw steering introduced in 1972 is a major upgrade with the intermediate platform, including optional power steering across the platform. The CJ also got a front axle upgrade that is stronger and lower maintenance with a tighter turning radius. The venerable Dana 18 was replaced with the Dana 20 which at the time was used across the whole Jeep line. The 20 does not have as deep a low range, but it is more durable and quieter than the 18. The AMC V8 is new for 1972.

    IMO you get quite a lot more with an intermediate than with a '71 or older. The major upgrade came in 1976, when almost every system changed in some way. The intermediates suffer from a comparatively short run - 1972-75 - which limits parts support for secondary systems. The driver's seating position in an intermediate is further to the left, which seems more natural. To me, they drive a whole lot better than the earlys, but it's been a long time since I've driven an early Jeep.
     
    Last edited: Mar 6, 2019
    FinoCJ likes this.
  8. Mar 6, 2019
    Cowboyjeeper

    Cowboyjeeper Member

    Show low az
    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2019
    Messages:
    473
    Very helpful. Thanks now I have to figure weather those updates are worth dealing with emissions otherwise I’m stuck at 1966
     
  9. Mar 6, 2019
    timgr

    timgr We stand on the shoulders of giants. 2022 Sponsor

    Medford Mass USA
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Messages:
    23,596
    Emissions before the '80s is really simple. Jeep did not even publish vacuum diagrams until 1978 or 1979.
     
  10. Mar 6, 2019
    dane71

    dane71 Member

    USA
    Joined:
    May 11, 2017
    Messages:
    195
    That is compelling. If youre willing to do the work an early with a v6, dana 30 front axle, partial frame box like the intermediates, disk brakes, and saginaw steering, would be the theoretical ideal imo. But again thats a lot of work! Does your local emissions testing check visual or just real world numbers?
     
  11. Mar 6, 2019
    Cowboyjeeper

    Cowboyjeeper Member

    Show low az
    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2019
    Messages:
    473
    Some visual but we go on the rollers with a sniffer. I have heard many times the older carburetor stuff struggles a lot better than ca though. That’s good that it’s not too bad in like 73 or74 if I find a good one
     
  12. Mar 6, 2019
    dane71

    dane71 Member

    USA
    Joined:
    May 11, 2017
    Messages:
    195
    Intended uses for the jeep? I havent driven the earlier ones but that'll help weigh out if the upgrades are even worthwhile to you, others can probably better chime in better with this information
     
  13. Mar 6, 2019
    tarry99

    tarry99 Member

    Northern California
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2012
    Messages:
    3,784
    How tall are you?..........The early Jeeps are tight and the column angle will either get your stomach or knees.......72 and later they get more roomy up front.......and better defrost & heat options........early has an offset D-44 tapered bearing rear axle and a D-18 TC w/ 2.46 gears...........later is centered axle and TC 2:1 ratio.

    Early Jeep upgrades that most do are: Power Steering, larger brakes going from 9" ( early ) to 10 & 11" drums & discs after 72......the steering & brake upgrade go hand and hand with adding a D-30 front axle from a 72 and later Jeep which also gets you 3" wider up front overall.....in 72 The straight 6 is a good platform and so is the little V6 dauntless in the early jeep...........so lots of choices and upgrades to think about how you'll use it.
     
    Last edited: Mar 6, 2019
  14. Mar 6, 2019
    Cowboyjeeper

    Cowboyjeeper Member

    Show low az
    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2019
    Messages:
    473
    I hear ya on room my first was a 53 cj3 lots of mods. I do like the v6 sounds great to me,however the way our market is I’ll likeley have to get a 4cyl n swap it.
     
  15. Mar 6, 2019
    Cowboyjeeper

    Cowboyjeeper Member

    Show low az
    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2019
    Messages:
    473
    Well I plan to use it to drive and to play off road but no really extreme stuff. Will be doing steering and brake upgrades
     
  16. Mar 6, 2019
    oldtime

    oldtime oldtime

    St. Charles,...
    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2006
    Messages:
    3,479
    I'm a fan of the 100% Jeep .... Trans-Model builds.
    Use the best from military inception through the end of the CJ era.

    The only real drawback is that it takes a lot of "know how" concerning parts progress and interchange.
     
    Lee Bennett likes this.
  17. Mar 6, 2019
    Cowboyjeeper

    Cowboyjeeper Member

    Show low az
    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2019
    Messages:
    473
    I like that idea a lot. How does one gain the knowledge with interchange and such. I’m not afraid to do work I like the satisfaction of driving something I’ve built
     
  18. Mar 6, 2019
    oldtime

    oldtime oldtime

    St. Charles,...
    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2006
    Messages:
    3,479
    Read or ask lots of questions.

    It's easiest to first determine your realistic needs and use-age.

    First choose whatever Jeep model (body style) and vintage that best fits your needs.
    Because the model and vintage determines whatever components and assemblies will be feasible for interchange.

    Then choose the engine that best suites your requirements.
    Engine selection is 2nd because the engine must fit the engine compartment.
    Engine selection yields the greatest effect upon proper selection of various other component assemblies.

    And so forth is sensible sequence of component fitment and effect.

    The end result must become a complete synchronous system of complimentary component assemblies.
     
    sterlclan likes this.
  19. Mar 6, 2019
    Cowboyjeeper

    Cowboyjeeper Member

    Show low az
    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2019
    Messages:
    473
    I already know I’d like a v6 cj5 n go from there.
    I’ve read that it’s not too hard to swap in a v6 if I find a good one that’s a 4
     
  20. Mar 6, 2019
    homersdog

    homersdog Tulsa, Ok 2024 Sponsor 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    Tulsa, OK
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2012
    Messages:
    2,372
    I grew up with a 71 with the Dauntless V6 & a 72 with the 304. drove both equally as a teenager. The 71 is dear to my heart and I still own it, but the 72 (long gone) was hands down a better jeep.
     
    Cowboyjeeper and Buildflycrash like this.
New Posts