Comp Cam Feedback?

I am having my :v6: engine rebuilt and opted to put in a different cam instead of the stock one. The engine shop said that to increase the torque there were two good cams http://www.compcams.com/Technical/Catalogs/106-03/HTML/110-113.asp
One was the 63-234-4 (the first one) and the other was the 63-235-4 (the second one)
He said both were good but the second was better for onroad and offroad because the RPM range only topped out at 5400. And the other cam tops out at 4800 so it wasnt so good for highway driving.
I dont ever remember getting even close to being above 4000 rpm and that was at 70 mph. Would going with the lower rpm range make that big of a difference? also if you have one in your engine how is the street drivability and also the low end torque of it?
Just trying to get some feedback if you like your comp cam.
Thanks Brian

 

Thanks thats what I chose I wasnt looking for a NASCAR jeep that had a high speed. I was just worried that I would loose a little drivabilty (if thats a word) on the highway by going with the lower rpm range.

 

Hey now. If I want all 72 hp the :hurrican: has to offer, I got to run up at 4K. R)

 

I would look more at where the cam STARTS working rather than where it stops. You want a cam that starts the torque curve at the lowest rpm possible so that max torque is made at a lower rpm when talking off road. If the starting rpm range is nice and low on both, say 800 rpm or so which is common, then go with the cam that tops out higher. If the cam that tops out at a higher rpm starts at a higher rpm than the other one, then go with the one that starts lower. You'll be much happier on the trail with it. Nickmil.