1. Registration trouble? Please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom right corner of the page and your issue will be resolved.
    Dismiss Notice

Bad Knee + T18= ouch. Hydraulic any help?

Discussion in 'Intermediate CJ-5/6/7/8' started by dsrt4, Jan 11, 2016.

  1. Jan 11, 2016
    dsrt4

    dsrt4 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2009
    Messages:
    555
    I have a 1973 cj5 with the stock clutch linkage working a swapped T18 with a 3 finger pressure plate.

    I have a bad left knee. I've considered swapping a automatic into it but at the stock wb that's pretty tight fit plus tons of cash.

    Will a hydraulic conversion help me out at all? I drive a 6 speed manual daily in a little focus I have and I can live with it. It has a hydraulic clutch and doesn't bother me.

    My jeeps leaves me limping.

    Help a guy out here.
     
  2. Jan 11, 2016
    johneyboy03

    johneyboy03 The green beast

    Quebec, Canada
    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2011
    Messages:
    2,115
    i did the hydro set-up swap 4 year ago, i wont ever come back to mechanichal linkage.

    I use slave and master from a jeep cj 1980-84 with the 4 cylinder. Way smoother than mechanical.
     
  3. Jan 11, 2016
    Howard Eisenhauer

    Howard Eisenhauer Administrator Staff Member

    Tantallon, Nova...
    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    8,102
  4. Jan 11, 2016
    dsrt4

    dsrt4 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2009
    Messages:
    555
    I'm not sure if I understand the last post.
     
  5. Jan 11, 2016
    RATTYFLATTY

    RATTYFLATTY I think you need a little more throttle

    Central MN
    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    515
    I don't have a manual linkage to compare it to but I have had others tell me that my hydro set feels lighter than the mechanical one they have. I also am using all stock components from an 80-84 4cyl CJ on my T18.
     
  6. Jan 11, 2016
    rejeep

    rejeep Well-Known Member 2024 Sponsor 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    Rochester, NY
    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2009
    Messages:
    1,691
    I have a hyd in my CJ and its easier than a mechanical, but having a bad left knee myself, im still sore some days.

    these aren't car clutches... still takes some umph to move in and out..
     
  7. Jan 11, 2016
    timgr

    timgr We stand on the shoulders of giants. 2022 Sponsor

    Medford Mass USA
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Messages:
    23,596
    I think Howard was suggesting some type of servo-controlled clutch, rather than the foot operated clutch. JMO - it's an interesting concept, but compared to an automatic swap you'd be way off into R&D land. Not what you asked for.

    I think the hydro clutch has to be less effort because of the friction you must overcome for a mechanical setup. How much less effort that is, I don't know. I would say the main factor would be the clutch plate though. A diaphragm clutch would be easier to operate, rather than the 3-finger (Borg & Beck) style.

    I suspect you can also adjust the mechanical advantage to make the clutch easier to operate. The linkage is designed to work for a long time without adjustment. The travel of the release rod is longer than it needs to be, if you adjusted it frequently. For more advantage with a mechanical clutch, you make the arm of the pedal-side of the bellcrank longer, or you make the release rod side shorter. With a hydraulic clutch, you have to change the ratio of piston sizes, or move the master up or down on the clutch pedal arm.

    Well, let me suggest you consider a (ahem) CJ-7 or YJ with an automatic? 10" longer wheelbase, but factory equipped with an automatic.
     
  8. Jan 11, 2016
    47v6

    47v6 junk wrecker! 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    USA
    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2006
    Messages:
    5,798
    Vacuum booster for hydraulic clutch master?! Like for brakes but smaller? R&D but?
     
  9. Jan 11, 2016
    dsrt4

    dsrt4 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2009
    Messages:
    555
    For right now this is just a get me buy deal. When I section it and make a cj6 out of it i will go with a decent automatic
     
  10. Jan 11, 2016
    Howard Eisenhauer

    Howard Eisenhauer Administrator Staff Member

    Tantallon, Nova...
    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    8,102
    Just as Tim stated- a power assisted or even a remotely operated clutch should be doable. A hydraulic clutch may improve things a bit but there's no free lunch- your leg will have to supply the pressure needed to operate the clutch if there's nothing there to help.

    H.
     
  11. Jan 11, 2016
    fesser

    fesser Napa, CA 2024 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    Napa, CA
    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2014
    Messages:
    542
    I am running the advanced adaptor chain linkage on my flatfender. It takes a lot less pressure than the original linkage to activate. Not sure if it is available for the CJ5 but it isn't expensive or hard to install. Might work for you.
    Edit: This is the part I was thinking of.
    http://www.advanceadapters.com/products/716640--jeep-1941-71-chain-control-assembly/
    They only list it as working with 41-71's. I sent them an email asking if it could be made to work on a 73. I will let you know if I hear back from them.
     
    Last edited: Jan 11, 2016
  12. Jan 11, 2016
    timgr

    timgr We stand on the shoulders of giants. 2022 Sponsor

    Medford Mass USA
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Messages:
    23,596
    Not meant for the suspended pedals that are used 1972-on.
     
  13. Jan 11, 2016
    Alan28

    Alan28 Well-Known Member 2022 Sponsor

    Châtillon en...
    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2012
    Messages:
    2,327
    If my left foot/leg have problems, and will be one day, I'll change for automatic transmission on a Jeep.
    No pedal at all.
    I have a Tiptronic on my Audi, it is pleasure.
    Of course, it won't be the Jeep of my young period. This is the choice.
     
  14. Jan 11, 2016
    fesser

    fesser Napa, CA 2024 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    Napa, CA
    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2014
    Messages:
    542
    That explains it. Thanks.
     
  15. Jan 11, 2016
    dsrt4

    dsrt4 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2009
    Messages:
    555
    I'm not looking for a free lunch. Really anything that helps cut down the stress the knee takes will do the job.
     
  16. Jan 11, 2016
    timgr

    timgr We stand on the shoulders of giants. 2022 Sponsor

    Medford Mass USA
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Messages:
    23,596
    I think Howard means "free lunch" only in a figurative sense. You have to put in a certain amount of work to compress the clutch cover, regardless of what leverage you use to move it. You can put in the same work over more time or distance, but force times distance equals work. More distance, less force, same amount of work.

    Conventional wisdom says that a diaphragm clutch is less work than a Borg & Beck, so that's one option. Hydraulic will make less friction so that means less work needed. Or you can change the mechanical advantage and move the pedal further with less force. That's about it.
     
  17. Jan 12, 2016
    fesser

    fesser Napa, CA 2024 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    Napa, CA
    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2014
    Messages:
    542
    [QUOTE="fesser, post:
    http://www.advanceadapters.com/products/716640--jeep-1941-71-chain-control-assembly/
    They only list it as working with 41-71's. I sent them an email asking if it could be made to work on a 73. I will let you know if I hear back from them.[/QUOTE]
    Got an email from Advance Adaptors. They now make a kit for the intermediates and up.
    http://www.advanceadapters.com/products/716639--jeep-clutch-control-system/
    A little pricey but I may go for it. I really like what the chain system did for my flatty.
     
  18. Jan 12, 2016
    timgr

    timgr We stand on the shoulders of giants. 2022 Sponsor

    Medford Mass USA
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Messages:
    23,596
    The main problem with the bell crank (other than being hard to push if you have a bum knee) is that frame twist will disable your clutch. If you stuff the right front (?) wheel and leave the left hanging, the bend of the frame moves the bell crank away from the bell housing, and the clutch pedal no longer works. Not really a problem in low range 1st gear (just start in gear), but annoying. The chain might help with that.

    An easy upgrade is to substitute Heim joints for the weak factory ball joints on the linkage. The ball joint on the release arm will wear out, and the release rod will fall off. If you don't use Heim joints, make a tether to the release rod so that you won't lose it if the ball joint fails.
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2016
  19. Jan 12, 2016
    wally

    wally SSSSTER

    upper merrimack...
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2005
    Messages:
    554
    mostly true, but there are instances that you describe (off-road, twisted) where one might need to shift into reverse because going forward is no longer an option. the twisted frame/bellcrank prevents that from being accomplished (driveline bind/torque makes the transmission stuck in gear, and without releasing the pressure [via declutch], you are stuck in first with nowhere to go). i've been there, which is one of the reasons (not the only one) i switched to the hydraulic setup. i know it's a rare thing to happen, but it can. i agree that the chain would probably help with that. i know the hydraulic does.



    to the OP, i'm not sure there's much difference in "leg fatigue/pressure" with the hydraulic vs mech linkage. the hydraulic is smoother, though.
     
  20. Jan 12, 2016
    ITLKSEZ

    ITLKSEZ Hope for the best, prepare for the worst

    Liberty Lake, WA
    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2015
    Messages:
    6,656
    FWIW, I had a car transmission behind my V-6 back in high school, and the bell housing we used to make it work had the pivot over on the passenger's side of the bell housing giving the actuation a 2:1 ratio (as opposed to the pivot on the driver's side being a 1:1 ratio). We had to use a cable to re-route the actuation to come in from the front, but the end result was twice the pedal engagement, but half the force.

    Another end with a similar result would be to alter the ratio of your existing linkage to give you more pedal travel through the range of engagement.
     
New Posts