1. Registration trouble? Please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom right corner of the page and your issue will be resolved.
    Dismiss Notice

Quadratrac axles

Discussion in 'Early CJ5 and CJ6 Tech' started by 1960willyscj5, Oct 17, 2008.

  1. Oct 17, 2008
    1960willyscj5

    1960willyscj5 Well-Known Member

    Mesa, Arizona
    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2006
    Messages:
    2,793
    Would it be possible to switch the D25/27 and D44 in an ECJ5 with those from a CJ7 with the turbo350/quadratrac setup? Or is that maybe a dumb idea with the F134 engine?:hurrican::):coffee:
     
  2. Oct 17, 2008
    sixtyfive5

    sixtyfive5 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Messages:
    83
    First, you alreay know anything is possible with a jeep. Yes, the swap should work. CJ7’s had a few different axle configurations that appeal to different folks for different reasons. I currently have a set of Wide Track axles (which were from 82-86 CJs) under my ECJ5. The extra width is what I wanted – stability and improved turning radius. Some opt for the Narrow Track axles from the earlier year CJ7’s and later model 5's.

    If the axles are from a quadratrack 7, then they are likely the narrow track (which would be near the width you have now – others on the board can tell you how close – I think the D30 narrow track front is a bit wider than the D25/27 you have – I just haven’t committed those types of specs to memory). And if memory serves, I think the rear AMC 20 used in QT set ups were offset..? If so, you’ll want to make sure things line up with the Tcase you plan to use. Maybe it will work with the d18 if that is what you plan to keep.

    There are some minor mods you will need to do with the swap – possibly spring perches in the rear, brake lines, drive shaft fitment maybe, etc. – but all minor in my opinion.
     
  3. Oct 17, 2008
    timgr

    timgr We stand on the shoulders of giants. 2022 Sponsor

    Medford Mass USA
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Messages:
    23,596
    It's a TH400. Jeep never used the TH350.

    Sure you could, but the rear axle is a AMC 20, which everybody hates. Plus I expect the original gear ratios won't be to your or the F134's liking. Doubtful you could get 4.10s with an automatic, probably only 3.54s or worse.
     
  4. Oct 17, 2008
    sixtyfive5

    sixtyfive5 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Messages:
    83
    Timgr brings up a great point about gearing that I shoud have addressed. I bet they are 3.54's. But don't let the AMC 20 scare you off. I know they aren't the most popular (use that to your buying advantage) but they can be upgraded to be respectful. I have a 20 now. uprgraded shafts. But I'll admit, I am on the lookout for a widetrack d44 (they had 'em in '86 CJs)...
     
  5. Oct 17, 2008
    lynn

    lynn Time machine / Early CJ5 HR Rep Staff Member

    Huntingdon PA
    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2002
    Messages:
    3,437
    Front should bolt up pretty well. Rear will be offset OK but perches will need to be relocated to match the ECJ5 spring positions.
    And then there's the gearing thing. The good news is that you shouldn't need a new rear carrier if you re-gear.
    I think the AMC 20 will be fine if you upgrade to one-piece axles, and weld the tubes to the center section (Stitch welds so no warpage)... and you don't use it for flying jumps over obstacles... ;)
     
  6. Oct 17, 2008
    timgr

    timgr We stand on the shoulders of giants. 2022 Sponsor

    Medford Mass USA
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Messages:
    23,596
    Jim (jpflat2a) wrote in a previous post that the 20 will last just fine if you keep the axle nuts tight. The main complaints about them are that the axles spin in the hubs, and that the tubes are weak. For a F134, I'm sure they would be more than strong enough.
     
  7. Oct 17, 2008
    jpflat2a

    jpflat2a what's that noise?

    Hermosa, SD
    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2003
    Messages:
    8,523
    be aware that replacement axle shafts will be hard to find (if you break or spin one).
    Aftermarket is junk (std axle) and the Q-trac was only used for 4 years; the offset is different with the Qtrac Model 20 than the other Model 20s; just something to think about.
     
  8. Oct 17, 2008
    1960willyscj5

    1960willyscj5 Well-Known Member

    Mesa, Arizona
    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2006
    Messages:
    2,793
    No jumping it? Darn, there goes that record breaking leap over the Grand Canyon next year.

    I was thinking on matching them to the D18. The offset is to the passenger side with both t/c's.

    The gearing will be a problem probably. Research indicates the 60 to 70 horsepower from the F-134 isn't enough for anything lower than about 4.03. Which is what it would be as a final drive ratio with the overdrive engaged. I don't have the overdrive, however. Was considering the switch to take advantage of the better braking and slightly wider stance.:hurrican::):coffee:
     
  9. Oct 18, 2008
    Kerrdog

    Kerrdog New Member

    north Florida
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2008
    Messages:
    31
    I'm not sure this is any help, and maybe I shouldn't mention it here (please let me know if I screwed up!), but I have what I believe is a Q-trac axle, with pinion yoke pass side drop, centered housing, one-piece axles that I will be pulling for WT axles. The axle tubes are about 15" each. It is a D44. It is in my 79 CJ5 (the PO installed it). I haven't positively IDed it yet, however. It is geared 3.73.
     
New Posts