1. Registration trouble? Please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom right corner of the page and your issue will be resolved.
    Dismiss Notice

225 gurus ?

Discussion in 'Early CJ5 and CJ6 Tech' started by trickpatrick, Oct 29, 2011.

  1. Oct 29, 2011
    trickpatrick

    trickpatrick Done? LOL

    North Idaho USA
    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2006
    Messages:
    838
    Hi all.
    Looking for some opinion and or advice.

    I have been unsatisfied with the power of my 225.
    Let me say I know its not a sbc and I am not comparing it to that kind of power.
    but I can tell its just not up to snuff.
    It runs out of power to low in the rpm band.

    Heres what I have and have done too it.

    When I got the jeepster it was running but I took it all apart right after driving it home the first day.
    I tested the compression and it was 150 average on all cylinders.
    So I decided to just add a few things.
    I had a '75 buick doner car with a oddfire 231 in it.
    I took the HEI off it and installed it it is the right dissy and is installed properly.
    I added the crane adjustable vacume unit with the adjustment backed all the way out.
    Plugs are .35 gap new wires
    any thing I have touched has new parts cap plugs etc.
    The carb was in better shape on the 231 so I rebuilt it and then discovered it wouldnt bolt on the original intake so I cleaned up the 231 intake and used it to.
    Then I ended up using the oil pump cover off the 231 also as it was in better shape.
    Rebuilt the oil pump add'd a new timing chain, water pump ect.

    I adjusted the carb with a vacume guage and have power timed it for best perfomance.

    It idles really good but doesnt rev up as freely as other 225 I have worked on.

    I have been reading alot of old threads about 225's performance.
    The only thing I have seen that makes me wounder was a mention of the 231 manifold not being a good fit and that it might cause flow problems.
    Can any one confirm this or have any ideas or advice.
     
  2. Oct 29, 2011
    w3srl

    w3srl All-around swell dude Staff Member

    Port Orange, FL
    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2002
    Messages:
    4,275
    Are you timing it by the mark on the 231 timing chain cover? IIRC they are different than the one from the 225.
     
  3. Oct 29, 2011
    Warloch

    Warloch Did you say Flattie??? Staff Member

    Falcon, CO
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
    Messages:
    5,466
    I use E3 plugs with my HEI and can tell a difference - I also believe they should be @ 45 gap. You want to check the advance with both the mechanical and then Vaccum with an actual timing light. I didn't see, but if you changed the timing cover then yes - they are different degrees (book in shop with number, but 18 sticks in my head). Not sure on the intake, but they can flow different. I swap all of mine to 4bbl setups.

    Lose of power in the low RPM points to cam in my book as well. What are you running in it?
     
  4. Oct 29, 2011
    nickmil

    nickmil In mothballs.

    Happy Valley, OR
    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2002
    Messages:
    12,529
    What intake gaskets did you use to put the 231 manifold on the 225? Felpro makes the best ones to keep the flow from being disrupted. I've found others to restrict flow. Also check the advance weight posts and springs in the distributor. Common for the bushings and posts to be worn causing issues. Also check the vacuum advance and make sure it isn't coming in too soon. You do have the advance hooked to ported vacuum and NOT manifold vacuum right? This is a common mistake and cause issues like you describe. I'd definitely look at what was suggested above as well.
     
  5. Oct 30, 2011
    trickpatrick

    trickpatrick Done? LOL

    North Idaho USA
    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2006
    Messages:
    838
    I will try some new plugs with more gap.
    I think I checked the wieghts but will look again
    I do use a timing light and I think the cover I used is right and the first one was wrong I will re research that.
    Cant remember which It was cast or bolt on pointer
    The cam is an unknow was thinking it could be flat.
    it is advancing and i have played with the crane adjustment no differance.
    i am sure I have it on ported vacume but will double check.
    The cap rotor wires and coil and plugs are new when I put in the HEI about 5000 miles ago.
    I dont remember replacing the electronic deal under the rotor where it plugs in its name is on the tip of my tounge err.

    I have a Qjet would that be doable with the right manifold?
    I am thinking about the 252 comp cam and a intake.

    The best way I can discribe it's lack of power is it feels abit like something is holding it back when it acelerates and at about 3000 grand it's done no more power not missing or running out of gas just flat.
    I have driven a buddy's 225 in his cj 5 and it pulls fast and hard to maybe 4500 rpm he does have a cam of some kind in it.
    And a 2 b carb he had a small holly 4b he couldnt get to run right so he switched back anyway mine's anemic next to it so I know its not me expecting more than normal

    I guess I will try a minor tuneup and just see.

    I dont remember which brand gasket I used I think I used the metal one with the pan in the valley.
    I did block off the egr valve.

    Rick
     
    Last edited: Oct 30, 2011
  6. Oct 30, 2011
    noahlon

    noahlon Old Fart

    Pine Ridge, AR
    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2010
    Messages:
    206
    I thought the 231 was an even fire ??
     
  7. Oct 30, 2011
    Patrick

    Patrick Super Moderator Staff Member

    Los Alamos, NM
    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2002
    Messages:
    8,360
    There were odd fire 231's as well.
     
  8. Oct 30, 2011
    trickpatrick

    trickpatrick Done? LOL

    North Idaho USA
    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2006
    Messages:
    838
    Buick kept it odd fire for a couple years.
    They used 350 pistons and came up with the 231 Oddfire.
    They also started using the HEI then also with a wierd cap for the oddfire motor.

    Then to smooth it out switched it to evenfire
    from what I remember they also lowered the compression.
    Probably helped with smog.
    but the 225 has more compression and thereby more torque.

    So the earlier say early '70's odd fire 231 have alot of common parts with our 225.
    One thing that changed with the even fire was the heads which was probably where the compression went down with say smog heads.
    All the gm lines were making those kinda changes right then.

    I think guys go to a 231 thinking its a better perfomance motor and then can be disapointed if they dont take compression into consideration.
    I bet there is a good combo of 231 and 225 parts to make a good jeep motor.
    The problem I see is Buick was making small changes all the time so you have to know exactly what parts would work well together.
    it would be cool to have a list of wreckingyard parts to assemble a lower budget power plant, no expensive machining involved.

    I think you want the 225 flywheel and maybe a 231 odd fire block and better compression heads 225 or shaved oddfire 231's ? 252h cam etc.

    Of course if you did an evenfire then FI would be a no brainer.

    I like my 2b it doesnt flood till im almost vertical, If I went 4b the only one I like is the Qjet but is that to big

    Rick
     
    Last edited: Oct 30, 2011
  9. Oct 30, 2011
    wheelie

    wheelie beeg dummy 2024 Sponsor 2023 Sponsor

    York, PA
    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2004
    Messages:
    4,491
    "I think guys go to a 231 thinking its a better perfomance motor and then can be disapointed if they dont take compression into consideration."

    Yup. Dunnit. Very disappointed. Should have kept the 225. It ran way better.

    "I bet there is a good combo of 231 and 225 parts to make a good jeep motor."

    A guy told me to put either, the 231 OF heads on the 225 or, vice versa. I forget which. It would make sense to me, to use the 225 heads on the 231 but, I'm not sure. I thought he said to do the opposite, 231 heads on a 225. Stinkin' bad memory. mehh
     
  10. Oct 30, 2011
    nickmil

    nickmil In mothballs.

    Happy Valley, OR
    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2002
    Messages:
    12,529
    '77 was the transition year from odd fire to even fire. Early '77 231's were oddfire and last part switched to even fire. The 4.1l (252) Buick V-6's used in Regals and some other applications came stock with a Q-jet and worked quite well. A 231 with a properly balanced 225 Jeep flywheel works very well because of the inertia of the heavier flywheel. I like the lighter 231 flywheel in the '59'5 as I can rev quickly. I also use it for sand and mud, not just trail running. If it were simply a daily driver, used mostly just on trails or rocks, then the heavier flywheel is an advantage. The 231/225 debate will rage on as long as there are Jeeps. There are advantages and disadvantages to both. The 231 evenfire in my '5 when I first installed it, rebuilt, with a mildly hotter cam, and a few head tweaks netted 220 hp at the rear wheels on a chassis dyno. With a Rochester Dualjet carb...

    The seriously built 225 in the Race Jeep was dyno'd well over 400 hp but was useless for the trail. Either motor is good for our application. It's just making the right tweaks and choosing the right parts. No different than any other motor.
     
  11. Oct 30, 2011
    nickmil

    nickmil In mothballs.

    Happy Valley, OR
    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2002
    Messages:
    12,529
    231 heads on a 225. They flow better. Been too long so I'd have to look up valve size but I do remember the flow bench numbers were better on the 231 heads.
     
  12. Oct 30, 2011
    trickpatrick

    trickpatrick Done? LOL

    North Idaho USA
    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2006
    Messages:
    838
    231 oddfire or evenfire heads? and anybody know about the compression effects when you go to 231 heads.
    I dont know if the compression diferances between the 225 and 231 is in the head or piston deck hight??
    I want to do the cam and could use the'77 231 oddfire heads I have, rebuilt first of course, also if you guys think it would payoff.
    my jeep is a trail jeep.

    I have a rebuildable Qjet off a 67 327 that I want to use then and just get a intake and cam.

    The flywheel talk makes me wounder if my buddys 5 has a 231 with a lighter flywheel not a 225.
    he didnt build it and it has all kinds off dressup stuff and is obviously rebuilt.

    That might be why his revs so much more freely than mine.
    Cant say if he has really any more power but his does rev up to 5000 no loss of power so there still is that with mine.
     
    Last edited: Oct 30, 2011
  13. Oct 31, 2011
    wheelie

    wheelie beeg dummy 2024 Sponsor 2023 Sponsor

    York, PA
    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2004
    Messages:
    4,491
    Odd fire heads. Even fire heads don't match up to the block and intake without some serious work, if at all. Nick, thanks for clarifying. Would the better flow of the 231 heads offset the difference in compression ratios? The 225 is like 9 or 9.5:1 and the 225 is, what, 8.0:1 or so.
     
  14. Oct 31, 2011
    SFaulken

    SFaulken Active Member

    Bellevue, WA
    Joined:
    May 24, 2011
    Messages:
    1,178
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but a heavier flywheel (like the one on the 225), would lead to a slower rev up, due to just moving more rotating mass. I wonder if mebbe your friend has the lighter flywheel, and you have the heavier......

    That being said, my bone stock 225, before it dropped #1, would rev pretty good to about 42-4300, then the carb just couldn't flow enough to maintain above that, like a built in rev-limiter. I pulled the stock Rochester and put a Motorcraft 2100 on there with an adapter, and that helped a bunch, I could hit 5000 if I wanted to (although, I'm not sure I would ever recommend it)

    Edit: I need to learn how to read. You said you suspected your friend had the lighter flywheel. Sheesh. Reading Comprehension, it's a good thing.
     
    Last edited: Oct 31, 2011
  15. Oct 31, 2011
    nickmil

    nickmil In mothballs.

    Happy Valley, OR
    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2002
    Messages:
    12,529
    I doubt it. The better flow would very much complement the higher compression ratio though.
     
  16. Oct 31, 2011
    Warloch

    Warloch Did you say Flattie??? Staff Member

    Falcon, CO
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
    Messages:
    5,466
    If you have not read, you probably should read Pat G's book on the V6s. It can be hard to find.
     
  17. Oct 31, 2011
    Vanguard

    Vanguard Take Off! Staff Member

    Vista, CA USA
    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    2,256
    225 has the cast in timing marks. 231 timing marks bolt to the cover.
     
  18. Oct 31, 2011
    wheelie

    wheelie beeg dummy 2024 Sponsor 2023 Sponsor

    York, PA
    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2004
    Messages:
    4,491
    What Chuck said. Pat Ganahl's book is THEE Buick V6 book. An excellent resource. Mine's............around.......here..............somewhere............
     
New Posts