1. Registration trouble? Please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom right corner of the page and your issue will be resolved.
    Dismiss Notice

Ford 2.3 and mazda 5-speed from a ranger...

Discussion in 'Early CJ5 and CJ6 Tech' started by waynaferd, Feb 14, 2011.

  1. Feb 14, 2011
    waynaferd

    waynaferd Hey, ya'll watch this!!

    That's Bangor,...
    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    224
    I found an adapter to use the T-90 with the 2.3, but I'm wondering if there's a simple way to fit the 5-speed in there, too. I haven't had any luck finding adapters or info for attaching the t-case to it, however.

    Its for a 55 cj5, which I had originally planned on a stretch and 318/727....my how things have changed, LOL.....

    The 2.3 is fuel injected from a 96, BTW.....

    Any ideas? I'm thinking 5 close ratio gears (comparitively) would really bring some pizzaz.

    Thanks!!
     
  2. Feb 14, 2011
    mb82

    mb82 I feel great!

    Charlottesville Va
    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2003
    Messages:
    2,706
    Problem with a 5 speed is they are too long to leave much if any rear driveshaft.
     
  3. Feb 14, 2011
    alex211

    alex211 Member

    Pennsylvania
    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Messages:
    441
    You'll have to bolt the transfer case to the rear end and use pivoting mounts for the engine.
     
  4. Feb 14, 2011
    Patrick

    Patrick Super Moderator Staff Member

    Los Alamos, NM
    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2002
    Messages:
    8,360
    Huh?

    Yes, too long, and those Mazda 5 speeds were not great transmissions.
     
  5. Feb 14, 2011
    waynaferd

    waynaferd Hey, ya'll watch this!!

    That's Bangor,...
    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    224
    Alrighty, I haven't looked at one but figured they were short stubby things....The T-90 it is I guess!

    Thanks!!
     
  6. Feb 14, 2011
    colojeepguy

    colojeepguy Colorado Springs

    At the foot of...
    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    7,153
    The 2.3 used to be a common swap, especially in flatfenders. It's a good engine that will give you a decent power boost and a lot more RPM capability without overpowering the stock drivetrain.
     
  7. Feb 15, 2011
    AKCJ

    AKCJ Active Member

    Fairbanks, Alaska
    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2003
    Messages:
    1,035
    I had an 87 ranger with the 2.3 and an older courier with the 2.3. It's a great motor.

    That 5-speed isn't so great.
     
  8. Feb 15, 2011
    waynaferd

    waynaferd Hey, ya'll watch this!!

    That's Bangor,...
    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    224
    This is from a 96 my father has that I used quite a bit....the frame rotted out and I rear ended a van, so it can't pass inspection and not really worth fixing.

    But it went pretty good, is rated at 105hp and 135ft.lbs, is FI and distributorless, so would make for a nice, nice driveable upgrade.

    Thanks!
     
  9. Feb 15, 2011
    repeater

    repeater I'll break it.

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2010
    Messages:
    98
    2.3 is a fantastic motor.....I'd grab one out of a turbo coupe though....now THAT would be fun....plenty of room to throw a small intercooler up front...just find an older one with a Garrett turbo rather than the intercooled IHI's turbo motors from 87/88...you can always add and plumb your own intercooler...and IHI turbos self-destruct when you push them over 14PSI...or if you already have the motor...you can probably make a franken-2.3 with an 84-85 head, exhaust manifold and turbo, and pull the ECU and wiring from the donor car. OK...I'm living my own imaginary project through your post...I'll shut up now.
     
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2011
  10. Feb 15, 2011
    Long&Low

    Long&Low Active Member

    Geauga County, OH
    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2009
    Messages:
    1,212
    You have to manage upgrades and the retention of stock parts wisely. It is easy to desire the whiz-bang hi-zoot stuff. I say do the engine swap and keep the T90 tranny, factory transfer case.

    More importantly, post the work in the Project section so we can see how you did it.
     
  11. Feb 15, 2011
    waynaferd

    waynaferd Hey, ya'll watch this!!

    That's Bangor,...
    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    224
    If I can get it there.....so far I need a $300 adapter....AFTER I find a $200-$300 (on ebay) bellhousing!

    I figured the Mazda 5 speed had a removeable bellhousing....wrong!

    I gotta call the local scrapyards to see what I can find, but past experiences are telling me it won't be good :D

    But novak has a really nice write up on the swap..... http://www.novak-adapt.com/knowledge/pinto.htm
     
  12. Feb 15, 2011
    alex211

    alex211 Member

    Pennsylvania
    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Messages:
    441
    It was a joke. jeep toss
     
  13. Feb 16, 2011
    waynaferd

    waynaferd Hey, ya'll watch this!!

    That's Bangor,...
    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    224
    One of the local scrappers has a few mustang 2.3 bellhousings from 87 to a 91, for only $35.00!! Woot woot!!

    'Cept I don't know if those are the correct ones for the Novak kit. I'll hafta get some pictures so I can compare to the one on their website, since I don't know WTF I'm looking at when I google 2.3 mustang bellhousing images :D
     
  14. Feb 27, 2011
    cerial

    cerial Banned

    Middleville MI
    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2010
    Messages:
    139
    Using a 2.3 turbo motor as a base engine without a turbo is a great place to start if you replace the engine . The turbo motors have cast pistons and other internals that will greatly help if you decide to lower the power curve. You really can't push a na motor with a bolt on turbo past 5 or so psi without hurting the "stock" internals.
     
New Posts