1. Registration trouble? Please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom right corner of the page and your issue will be resolved.
    Dismiss Notice

Rear Disc Brake Conversion With Parking Brake

Discussion in 'Builds and Fabricators Forum' started by FinoCJ, Oct 21, 2022.

  1. Oct 24, 2022
    Steamboat Willys

    Steamboat Willys Member 2024 Sponsor 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    Paddock Lake, WI
    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    Messages:
    150
    I'm using Richard from R&P’s 1/4 ton brake kit without the parking brake. It uses a thinner, non-vented rotor. I think I could update to Cadillac Eldorado calipers if I wanted to add the parking brakes. Loved his bracket and set up. I did have to play a little with the bearings to get everything lined up correctly, but that could have been the fronts. Sometimes the memory is a little fuzzy.

    I had a lot of issues with the Wildwood remote reservoirs leaking. 2 different sets from Wildwood. Both leaked :steamed: Had to repaint my firewall twice. I ended up making my own reservoirs out of billet.
     
    Renegade ll likes this.
  2. Oct 24, 2022
    FinoCJ

    FinoCJ 1970 CJ5 Staff Member

    Bozeman, MT
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2013
    Messages:
    5,650
    Richard is on my call list soon, but just to ask, does his rotor press on to the back of the wheel hub, or is it outboard and slip over the lug studs on the outside of the hub?
     
  3. Oct 24, 2022
    Renegade ll

    Renegade ll Member

    Thayne Wyoming
    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2013
    Messages:
    782
    I have the R&P 1/4 ton disc brake kit front and rear. I have the S10 calipers so I will be following your e-brake thread.
     
    Norcal69 likes this.
  4. Oct 24, 2022
    nickmil

    nickmil In mothballs.

    Happy Valley, OR
    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2002
    Messages:
    12,529
    The 1/4 ton kit slips on over the outside of the hub.
     
    Norcal69, Rich M. and FinoCJ like this.
  5. Oct 24, 2022
    47v6

    47v6 junk wrecker! 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    USA
    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2006
    Messages:
    5,801
    there are 3 different sets of wheel bearings. They will all work, but early hubs and bearings are different.

    the d27/drum d30 are the same set and will work just fine with the disk hubs. On d30 disk spindles you need to use the thinner larger bearing, but they all work.
     
    FinoCJ likes this.
  6. Oct 24, 2022
    FinoCJ

    FinoCJ 1970 CJ5 Staff Member

    Bozeman, MT
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2013
    Messages:
    5,650
    Sorry I am a bit dense...so all the hubs are the same and just the bearings change with the d30 disk spindles, or the hub is also different between the D30 disk and the earlier D25/27/30drum?

    Mostly, I ask as if I need new hubs with the machined disk mating surface, would D25/27 hubs from any of the typical aftermarket suppliers work, or would they be drum style castings? Parts dude sells hubs specifically for disc conversions for D25/27 (https://stores.partsdude4x4.net/wheel-hub/) - is that style the standard for the aftermarket today or do I have to be careful what I order for hubs (I am assuming my current hubs will not work, although that is TBD)? Or are only the 76+ D30 disc guaranteed to have the machined backside surface? It seems some early D25/27 hubs have the machined surfaced backside - so is it just random which ones are machined and which are not? Did something change with the hubs with the outboard 10" bendix style that came with the v6?
    Sorry - even after a good amount of research - this topic of the hubs is new to me (although it makes sense). It seems a lot of people have gone ahead and made the drum style hubs work with the disks, but I understand its not ideal. The more you start adding in the cost of new hubs and associated bearings, the cost of the kits isn't so surprising (most of them include new hubs etc).
     
  7. Oct 24, 2022
    timsresort

    timsresort Active Member 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    South Lake Tahoe CA
    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2014
    Messages:
    1,402
    That's my brother Sam. WB is stretched to 109". It works well, but he had a pretty violent rollover in Moab this year. He replaced ws frame, doors, fenders, hood, grille, rear D60 ring and pinion was even broken.
     
    FinoCJ and colojeepguy like this.
  8. Oct 24, 2022
    47v6

    47v6 junk wrecker! 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    USA
    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2006
    Messages:
    5,801
    I'm not sure you can get new non machined hubs for use with drums. I bought cheap old drum hubs and machined them to true then up for disks and it was a hassle that just didn't work right. In the end it was way cheaper to just buy new hubs. They have been acceptable quality and I am running them now front and back of my CJ. I did modify the back hubs to accept 7/16 studs to work with my full float setup. The new hubs accepted this oversized stud and I have had no issue. Don't think about it too hard. They are just hubs that work.
     
    Last edited: Oct 25, 2022
    FinoCJ likes this.
  9. Oct 25, 2022
    duffer

    duffer Rodent Power

    Bozeman, MT
    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2009
    Messages:
    4,507
    IIRC, the D25/D27 spindles/hubs use two Timken Set 45 bearings. The D30 disc hubs use the larger ID Timken Set 47 inner bearing and Set 45 for the outer. The D30 seal is also larger diameter. I would be looking for a good pair of used Dana D30 disc brake hubs. I found a nice pair on flebay for $45. These will have the Dana diamond "logo" cast into them. The older Crown hubs were ok too, just a little less precise on getting the machining well centered on the casting, especially notable on the flange mounting bolt bosses. Their current offering are probably identical to Omix.
     
    FinoCJ likes this.
  10. Oct 25, 2022
    47v6

    47v6 junk wrecker! 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    USA
    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2006
    Messages:
    5,801
    The D25 and D27 will work with the newer bearings. The seals for the D30 disk are different. The LM bearings are thinner, width wise, but the new one will work. It's not relevant if you buy new D30 hubs, which are new and work fine.
     
  11. Oct 25, 2022
    jeep peep69

    jeep peep69 Member

    redding ca.
    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2007
    Messages:
    623
    Just my perspective I have just under 250 dollars invested in the front disk brake conversion on my Dana 27 using metcalfs brackets and 3/8" spacer the hardest part was find the correct length studs the list of part #he provided for them was not very good to say the least. I'm using the spacer because I'm not into grinding the calipers so my 15"wheel will fit. If you're not concerned with grinding the calipers then you don't need the spacers. The cost is for all the parts needed .
     
  12. Nov 1, 2022
    FinoCJ

    FinoCJ 1970 CJ5 Staff Member

    Bozeman, MT
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2013
    Messages:
    5,650
    This is more documentation for my own use and to revisit later than anything else....

    I talked to Richard from R&P....may have a new plan with regard to this - and in classic style, maybe more old school with less functionality :). He has 11" bendix style backing plates with integrated cable parking brake function from the rear of 70s FSJs. That would solve the two important things which is getting rid of the manual adjusters, and keeps some sort of of parking brake without having to go to a D18 drum. I have the dual cable system on the wagon with an 'upper' cable from the handle to the cross-member mounted lever that pulls the 'lower' cable that goes to the brakes - not sure how of this cable set-up can be re-used with the bendix style, or how functional the parking brake truly is?

    The other rear parking brake options would be
    1) D18 parking drum - I have trouble keeping the CJ D18 parking brake oil free, clean, dry, adjusted and functional....Good thing about this option is that it keeps all drum and disc brakes option open.
    2) Use a small 1/4 ton GM style disc brake conversion with Cadillac Eldorado style calipers on the rear - I don't like the eldo calipers as they are 'finnicky' and seem to be hard to keep the service caliper in adjustment. I realize it has a lot to do with ensuring use of the cable parking brake, but the cable spring is a poor design in that it is fully exposed to dirt and crud and gets pretty crusty and looses functionality as its condition deteriorates rather quickly. (this coming from having helped a friend with his on his well used YJ - seems every couple years he's got maintenance to do on them getting them cleaned and functional again).
    3) Brennan's ford EEbrake which goes along with a full disc brake conversions - This may be the most functional by far, but not loving having such a wide range of 'random application' parts for the brakes on the both the front and rear - going this route would mean going disc on the on the front either using his Tracker style or GM 1/4 ton. I am kind of tempted by this as the parking brake seems very functional....
    4) Go one-off custom and modify the caliper bracket to also fit a small parking brake caliper (which I think is what Norcal is trying to do).

    I was planning the traditional 11" bendix style on all 4 corners until I realized the D30 backing plates I have are not parking brake compatible....so I definitely don't feel the need to run discs on the rear - it was mostly that I thought maybe there was a good parking brake solution going that route (Brennan is probably pretty close). So basically, I could stay the course of drums on all 4 corners using the FSJ backing plates from Richard, and I have the backing plates and its also a very known commodity for me as I've done them before. I think the 11" bendix improve braking over the OEM 11" manual adjusters (wagner) as the shoes 'float' better on each end and it makes better contact with the drum, but overall, it would be less about improving braking performance, and more about just getting rid of the manual adjusters. Also, no changes in to the 10lbs valves in my MC nor brake line mods would be needed, and its also a very known commodity for me as I've done them before, and its the cheapest option...

    But, disc brakes are sexy, and discs in the front with self adjusting drums in the rear is also very tried and true and would improve braking performance. Richard has the traditional GM 1/4 ton (S-10) conversion using rotos that go over the outside of the wheel hub....this saves me some money from having to deal with machining or buying new hubs to fit the 'thick' rotors on the backside of the hub as used with the GM 1/2 ton conversion, as well as makes turning or replacing the rotors much easier. One big question here...I would like to do a knuckle stud conversion while doing this project, and the caliper bracket is thicker than the drum backing plate - so I would need a slightly longer knuckle stud than used normally - guessing 1/8-1/4" longer? Also, with the rotor going over the outside of the hub, longer wheel studs would probably be needed. Another thing I like about this route - if I ever got rid of the D25 (and went D44 with OEM discs), I could move these brakes over the CJ pretty easily, so it wouldn't be a waste of money...
     
  13. Nov 2, 2022
    nickmil

    nickmil In mothballs.

    Happy Valley, OR
    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2002
    Messages:
    12,529
    Yes you want longer studs to clear the brackets.
     
  14. Nov 7, 2022
    Norcal69

    Norcal69 Out of the box thinker 2024 Sponsor 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    Northern California
    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    3,568
    This is basically the same setup that I have on my Jeep now, S-10 calipers up front with vented rotors and 11" parking brake drums on the rear. You will likely be pretty happy with that setup.
     
    Lockman and Jw60 like this.
New Posts